Message from @Human Sheeple

Discord ID: 597895244654313506


2019-07-08 21:00:43 UTC  

Oof

2019-07-08 21:00:43 UTC  

The Bible says the earth is flat 300 times. However I only believe it is flat because that is what I see. No evidence at all that it is round.

2019-07-08 21:00:45 UTC  

globe model = globe religion

2019-07-08 21:00:50 UTC  

so you're all deeply religious

2019-07-08 21:00:50 UTC  

^

2019-07-08 21:00:54 UTC  

Appeal to definition fallacy

2019-07-08 21:00:55 UTC  

You could literally do that with ANY set of words... LOL

2019-07-08 21:00:58 UTC  

Yikes

2019-07-08 21:01:06 UTC  

oh great a masonic look at the bble lool

2019-07-08 21:01:07 UTC  

That's a made up fallacy

2019-07-08 21:01:11 UTC  

Just supposed "experts" demanding I believe them not my own eyes.

2019-07-08 21:01:13 UTC  

Cherry picking at its finest

2019-07-08 21:01:32 UTC  

It’s in the dictionary as an official term sheeple

2019-07-08 21:01:32 UTC  

```Description: Using a dictionary’s limited definition of a term as evidence that term cannot have another meaning, expanded meaning, or even conflicting meaning. This is a fallacy because dictionaries don’t reason; they simply are a reflection of an abbreviated version of the current accepted usage of a term, as determined by argumentation and eventual acceptance. In short, dictionaries tell you what a word meant, according to the authors, at the time of its writing, not what it meant before that time, after, or what it should mean.

```

2019-07-08 21:01:37 UTC  

It’s still picking some sort of information and interpreting in a logical way

2019-07-08 21:01:38 UTC  

So the dictionary is wrong

2019-07-08 21:01:44 UTC  

Alright then

2019-07-08 21:01:49 UTC  

Words don't mean anything then

2019-07-08 21:01:53 UTC  

Wow

2019-07-08 21:01:56 UTC  

Deep

2019-07-08 21:02:14 UTC  

OK let's look up the SCIENTIFIC definition

2019-07-08 21:02:20 UTC  

"The important point that Becher introduced is that the explanation of a natural phenomenon (i.e., MODEL, theory) must be "TESTABLE" by "EXPERIMENTATION" .
In other words once a MODEL is proposed as an explanation of a phenomenon, it can "ONLY" be considered a "SCIENTIFIC MODEL" if it can be objectively
"TESTED BY EXPERIMENTATION ."
http://www.iun.edu/~cpanhd/C101webnotes/introduction/scientific-method.html

2019-07-08 21:02:38 UTC  

Religion. An institutional system of beliefs taught. Often called science.

2019-07-08 21:02:40 UTC  

I think your premise was incorrect to begin with - first word chosen sent you down a rabbit hole until it confirmed your bias

2019-07-08 21:02:55 UTC  

Hence my calling out the fallacy

2019-07-08 21:02:56 UTC  

Messy

2019-07-08 21:03:10 UTC  

Is a model airplane the same as a scientific model?

2019-07-08 21:03:16 UTC  

This is all opinions.

2019-07-08 21:03:38 UTC  

DisProve timezones flat earthers

2019-07-08 21:03:38 UTC  

Or is it the mod·el
/ˈmädl/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
a three-dimensional representation of a person or thing or of a proposed structure, typically on a smaller scale than the original.

2019-07-08 21:03:52 UTC  

^

2019-07-08 21:04:11 UTC  

Number 2 on the deffination. Science is often religion. So many beliefs taught with no solid proof. That is religion not actual Science.

2019-07-08 21:04:31 UTC  

@mineyful So where's the TESTABLE EXPERIMENT for the globe?

2019-07-08 21:04:34 UTC  

a system or thing used as an example to follow or imitate.

2019-07-08 21:04:35 UTC  

Evolution is religion

2019-07-08 21:04:37 UTC  

That’s the second bit

2019-07-08 21:04:41 UTC  

If it's not testable, then it's not a SCIENTIFIC model then, is it?

2019-07-08 21:04:49 UTC  

I’m not arguing the globe rn just calling out the fallacy

2019-07-08 21:05:03 UTC  

Helping to strengthen your argument

2019-07-08 21:05:04 UTC  

It's not a fallacy if you can't prove the globe is a scientific model

2019-07-08 21:05:11 UTC  

If it's not a scientific model, then it's a system of postulates