Like 5 times

isn't that an analogous fallacy

I know

You always copy pasta what wiki says

When tested till there was enough air to push against, exhaust, the rocket did not move.

ad hom

i'mma go and come back when you guys are cooled down

That's not ad hom mate

It did move. Plus the first test was the wrong kind of rocket.

I could care less what you say. That test proved reality.

attacking the person

not the argument

ditto @Steve Angell , respectfully

Yes it took them a long time to even get the rocket on fire. They needed air to do it.

I was saying what you told me is that exact thing I read on wiki

@Steve Angell what about guns and recoil i guess?

Because it’s not a rocket with fuel tanks and oxidizer tank. It was a kids model rocket engine lolol

you're welcome to go deeper on the wiki wave, i'm just doing it for sake of time

They had to glue in the starter fuel so it had air to work.

https://youtu.be/1P1C9wOt4z8

“I don’t care what you have to say” - exactly ... what’s the point.

that vid is really good @Australian Guy ^

they're deflecting and setting up straws for gotcha's

you sent it

@RidleyChozo

we gotta be careful

i got it from you

Yes, which is not how nasa rockets work. At all

isn't that part with the car insane? at about 12 min

or any rocket, rather

doesn't matter if it was made by NASA

Well show me this huge Vacuum tank test with a real rocket. Wait you have zero proof of your claim.

you could make your own if you wanted enough

ditto steve

Well, children’s model engine rockets. That’s how they work.

wasn't that a strawman right there steve

But it would be too small. Wow. You seem to be saying trust the liars.

can't emulate it in your tank so now the whole argument is gone

Imagine using an air fuel rocket to try and demonstrate rocket in a vacuum.

y i k e s

When they obviously fake video to sell space. I trust nothing they claim.