Message from @mineyful
Discord ID: 600518087200210944
No, you don’t.
we just explained it
in cars, fuel is different
Like 5 times
isn't that an analogous fallacy
I know
You always copy pasta what wiki says
When tested till there was enough air to push against, exhaust, the rocket did not move.
ad hom
i'mma go and come back when you guys are cooled down
That's not ad hom mate
It did move. Plus the first test was the wrong kind of rocket.
I could care less what you say. That test proved reality.
attacking the person
not the argument
ditto @Steve Angell , respectfully
Yes it took them a long time to even get the rocket on fire. They needed air to do it.
I was saying what you told me is that exact thing I read on wiki
@Steve Angell what about guns and recoil i guess?
Because it’s not a rocket with fuel tanks and oxidizer tank. It was a kids model rocket engine lolol
They had to glue in the starter fuel so it had air to work.
“I don’t care what you have to say” - exactly ... what’s the point.
that vid is really good @Australian Guy ^
they're deflecting and setting up straws for gotcha's
you sent it
we gotta be careful
i got it from you
Yes, which is not how nasa rockets work. At all
isn't that part with the car insane? at about 12 min
or any rocket, rather
doesn't matter if it was made by NASA
Well show me this huge Vacuum tank test with a real rocket. Wait you have zero proof of your claim.
you could make your own if you wanted enough
ditto steve
Well, children’s model engine rockets. That’s how they work.
wasn't that a strawman right there steve
But it would be too small. Wow. You seem to be saying trust the liars.
can't emulate it in your tank so now the whole argument is gone