Message from @Mr.PiFfTiNgZ
Discord ID: 600814710442688527
So what observations
My mans fell over a bottle and we kicked the shxt out of I
*it
Well, one could start with the geodetic surveying and the use of spherical triangles. I could also mention the abudance of globe-based maps, which despite being based on an incorrect model, still manage to navigate quite wonderfully. I could mention that the globe model also explains the seasons, the day/night cycle, the phases of the moon, the eclipses, the tides, etc, all in one coherent model. The flat earth model can't even explain one of those in a way that matches current observation.
piff ting most wanted yk
Cool
Study circumnavigation
Also seasons can be explained easily as well as the eclipses and tides
Also the globe earth cannot explain sunbeams,gas pressure without a container,etc
Impossible on a globe earth
I’m about to kick my cat in the face u get me
>>mute 525751734170025988 paid-shill
<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully muted **blaxxedxut47**#1737
paid-shill
3UP
3up Kramtom King
One thing at a time if you will. First, we will focus on circumnavigation, since you brought it up first.
Pour water on the floor
The moon also emits it’s own light aka cold light
No evidence of curvature,rotation,$ Motion
The moon emitting it’s own light is impossible on a globe heliocentric earth
3up crater
if i get my hands on a op i aint wetting him once, im wetting him numerous times
3⃣⬆
threearrow_up
3⃣ ⬆
Circumnavigation on the southern latitudes on a flat earth would be dramatically different than on a globe. The globe asserts that the largest diamater is around the equator, while the flat earth asserts that the largest is around the ice wall. Basically, travel in the southern parallels would take much, much longer when compared to the northern latitudes, but that is observed basically nowhere. Most flat earthers tend to agree with the 72k mile circumference of the ice wall, yet that would mean that every parallel leading up to the ice wall would also get progressively larger.
Moving onto seasons, that graphic you presented would result in the angular size of the sun changing throughout the year, which would be very easy to measure since the sun is claimed to be small/local.
Since you didn't explain eclipses and tides on the flat earth, I can't exactly comment on that.
2 44s in a 4 door drive up pull up everyone pause..aight
I was in a bando you was in a party tryna go home with a wh*re (trap) ....aight (trap brr brr )...aight
Cerpscular rays are also parallel and not a valid form of measuring distance to the sun. Also that whole gas pressure arguments stems from ignorance and cherry-picking what pressure actually means.
Yo, remember that girl called Heather?
Didn't link her 'cause she had a lot of cheddar (What d'ya mean?)
When I say cheddar, I don't mean cash
I mean like cheese, Heather didn't have a bath
piffting accepts contactless payments
Atmospheric pressure is the result of the weight of the atmosphere, which makes sense considering that 75 percent of the atmosphere is in the troposphere and the gradient hasn't been explained whatsoever on the flat earth side.
Demonstrate gas pressure without a container
the container is the atmosphere you mongoloid
Gas is not a container
it is
Prove it
Lol, going straight to that, are we? Not even going to attempt to address the other points I brought up?
Please demonstrate it