Common sense (which is subjective) is not science.

Try again

If you think the earth is flat then prove it buddy

Go get the direct measurements of the curvature or concede you are pulling shit from your ass.

That's not how burden of proof works, genius.

You made a claim

Now demonstrate it

It’s difficult to measure by eye, as the curvature is tiny compared to what a human can see.

😂😂 the earth is flat lmfao

I said measurements. I didn't say observations.

The earth is not flat

Idiots

@ironeo 👍

@DanielNCFC15 So, you're just going to mock and laugh instead of demonstrating that you know how to prove your globe?
Go on, demonstrate how the earth is a globe with science and measurements.

@ironeo Prove it, genius.

Same person

Pretty good app

yeah it's pretty good

No i dont think i will prove it

Ok, then. Goodbye.

!mute @ironeo

rip

bold claims

wasn't prepared

soon i'll present my things

and a few essays

I saw curvature on a plane

😂😂

@DanielNCFC15 Show us. Because you're lying.

Is their any flat earthers with credentials

Here's a research paper, full scientific method and all, on showing the curvature of the earth: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228420201_Measurement_of_the_Earth's_radius_based_on_historical_evidence_of_its_curvature

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 he did

But see the problem is

That the plane is curved so it makes it look like you can see curvature

I just watched a video titled gas pressure without a container ... guess what the gas pressure was in

Alright I will show u

Measurement of the Earth's radius based on historical evidence of its curvature:
Abstract:
Probably the most direct observation of the Earth’s curvature is how objectsappear from over the horizon when we approach them and disappear as weget further away from them. Similarly, the portion of a high object (abuilding or a mountain) that is visible depends on the height of the sitewhere the observation is made. Based upon these very obvious facts, asimple method to estimate the Earth’s radius R has been applied. Themethod does not need either sophisticated instrumentation or complexmathematics. In our application of the method presented here, the result isR = 6600 ±600 km in the best case. A discussion is presented about thepossible use of this method in ancient times. Surprisingly enough, we havenot found any reference to the use of this method despite its being simplerthan, for example, the classical approach of Eratosthenes

here's a snippet