Message from @A$AP Chloee
Discord ID: 603618221345734666
mhm
Watch this video
<:Redpill:551640293372329984>
lol the Principle!
rather than linking me to something, can you tell me in your own words?
the results for Michelson-Morley were, specifically, that light propagates at the same speed in all reference frames. Two conclusions can be drawn from this: 1) Aether exists but it and the earth are stationary. 2) Aether does not exist on a spinning globe. However you choose to interpret the data is unfortunately begging the question, thus making Michelson-Morley pretty much useless in a geocentric/heliocentric debate.
There’s no such thing as a reference frame
Also, the first one is true
The earth is stationary and the ether exist
👍
✌️
I see now who's brainwashed. That's too bad.
How do you know the second one is true?
Brainwashing
That’s too bad
I don't. I just said you can't know either is true based purely on Michelson-Morley.
Michelson-Morley provides little help with this debate.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Lol
ad homs 👌
I don’t think you know what an ad hom is
attacking my character silly
anyway, you have yet to tell me how Michelson-Morley supports anything.
@Drewski4343 no
That’s not an ad hom
I can pull you off the street and attack your character
Wouldn’t make it an ad hom
What is an ad hom
```Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.```
Makes sense thanks drew
no prob
According to mainstream science your floor is a fixed frame of reference moving through 4D lorentzian space-time
morning sheeple! I see you've been studying for 97.
have you guys debated UA yet?
hello
im new to the flat earth scene
Hey Gary, welcome
Did not stay very long...