Message from @A$AP Chloee

Discord ID: 603617935768158219


2019-07-24 15:50:44 UTC  

Michelson-Morley did not prove aether.

2019-07-24 15:53:20 UTC  

@Drewski4343 yes it did brainwashed monkey

2019-07-24 15:53:53 UTC  

Care to tell me how? because I actually know the results, and they have nothing to do with the aether.

2019-07-24 15:55:13 UTC  

Really

2019-07-24 15:55:18 UTC  

mhm

2019-07-24 15:55:25 UTC  

Watch this video

2019-07-24 15:55:31 UTC  

<:Redpill:551640293372329984>

2019-07-24 15:55:36 UTC  

lol the Principle!

2019-07-24 15:56:04 UTC  

rather than linking me to something, can you tell me in your own words?

2019-07-24 15:59:30 UTC  

the results for Michelson-Morley were, specifically, that light propagates at the same speed in all reference frames. Two conclusions can be drawn from this: 1) Aether exists but it and the earth are stationary. 2) Aether does not exist on a spinning globe. However you choose to interpret the data is unfortunately begging the question, thus making Michelson-Morley pretty much useless in a geocentric/heliocentric debate.

2019-07-24 16:01:16 UTC  

There’s no such thing as a reference frame

2019-07-24 16:01:24 UTC  
2019-07-24 16:01:27 UTC  

Also, the first one is true

2019-07-24 16:01:33 UTC  

The earth is stationary and the ether exist

2019-07-24 16:01:37 UTC  

👍

2019-07-24 16:01:40 UTC  

✌️

2019-07-24 16:01:55 UTC  

I see now who's brainwashed. That's too bad.

2019-07-24 16:02:06 UTC  

How do you know the second one is true?

2019-07-24 16:02:08 UTC  

Brainwashing

2019-07-24 16:02:10 UTC  

That’s too bad

2019-07-24 16:02:26 UTC  

I don't. I just said you can't know either is true based purely on Michelson-Morley.

2019-07-24 16:02:39 UTC  

Michelson-Morley provides little help with this debate.

2019-07-24 16:03:12 UTC  

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

2019-07-24 16:03:18 UTC  

Yes it does you ingrate

2019-07-24 16:03:22 UTC  

Lol

2019-07-24 16:03:37 UTC  

ad homs 👌

2019-07-24 16:03:49 UTC  

I don’t think you know what an ad hom is

2019-07-24 16:03:59 UTC  

attacking my character silly

2019-07-24 16:04:49 UTC  

anyway, you have yet to tell me how Michelson-Morley supports anything.

2019-07-24 16:06:26 UTC  
2019-07-24 16:06:36 UTC  

That’s not an ad hom

2019-07-24 16:06:43 UTC  

I can pull you off the street and attack your character

2019-07-24 16:06:47 UTC  

Wouldn’t make it an ad hom

2019-07-24 16:09:48 UTC  

What is an ad hom

2019-07-24 16:10:10 UTC  

```Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.```

2019-07-24 16:10:56 UTC  

Makes sense thanks drew

2019-07-24 16:11:00 UTC  

no prob

2019-07-24 16:11:31 UTC  

According to mainstream science your floor is a fixed frame of reference moving through 4D lorentzian space-time

2019-07-24 16:11:51 UTC  

morning sheeple! I see you've been studying for 97.

2019-07-24 16:12:32 UTC  

have you guys debated UA yet?