i'm guessing he wasn't fired because he "dubunked" round earth

it's because flat earthers shouldn't be in nasa

just listen to him talk and make up your own mind

they're the ones laughing at you

ok buddy

so, it's ironic you guys laughing

if you really want to talk about who's laughing at who, more than 90 percent of people are round-earthers

then it's more than 90percent that are being laughed at

This guy is self taught and he's a painter

the question is who's laughing is justified

self taught?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

honestly i'm not getting into a debate with another flat earther

yes, he's a painter

i'll probably get muted

He doesnt even want to answer what his profession was

yeah, whatever he's talking about, he didn't learn it in school

He was hired as a painter

he does,, he was a freelance painter and photo manipulator

If you deny blatant evidence and create a diversion to proof there is a good chance you're causing problems

What even are you talking about?

Why would curvature have to be taken into account??

^

If you make sure your structure is level, that's curvature taken into account.

Moving with the spin, but no curving with the curve?

Also if he talks about curpuscular sun rays then I'm not going to pay anymore attention to him

you automatically curve with the curve if you maintain height and level.

who Hamburger?

the person talking to you

Which the bridge doesn't

look guys, we don't have to debate no one

so they did not level the bridge ever?

just wait a few decades or so and space comercial flight will be available

the bridge looks like it alters height for aesthetic purposes...

The bridge is constant even in photo

@carlito the painter

No curvature on it

dude. that argument has already been said 100 times

you asked for an example of a nasa employee.. it seems that you were just asking for the sake of asking since it's obvious you aren't going to watch it

I never asked

Globe heads always deny proof