Message from @carlito
Discord ID: 603651891121094706
Picture>words if you need words to try to so against picture proof your argument is invalid
ok but there is a text on your picture
I guess the NASA photos are valid now
<:uh_duhh:583617741684998154>
curvature of the earth doesn't really have to be account for if it's only 150km
the text says that there is no curvature, but the text could have been a mac and cheese recipe and it would also be valid because there is no source for that text
Nasa isn't pictures, it is cartoons
nasa pictures are mostly composites
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Cliche language
wdym
here's another interview with another ex nasa employee for those interested
i'm guessing he wasn't fired because he "dubunked" round earth
it's because flat earthers shouldn't be in nasa
just listen to him talk and make up your own mind
they're the ones laughing at you
ok buddy
so, it's ironic you guys laughing
if you really want to talk about who's laughing at who, more than 90 percent of people are round-earthers
This guy is self taught and he's a painter
the question is who's laughing is justified
self taught?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
honestly i'm not getting into a debate with another flat earther
yes, he's a painter
i'll probably get muted
He doesnt even want to answer what his profession was
yeah, whatever he's talking about, he didn't learn it in school
He was hired as a painter
he does,, he was a freelance painter and photo manipulator
If you deny blatant evidence and create a diversion to proof there is a good chance you're causing problems
What even are you talking about?
Why would curvature have to be taken into account??
^
If you make sure your structure is level, that's curvature taken into account.
Moving with the spin, but no curving with the curve?
Also if he talks about curpuscular sun rays then I'm not going to pay anymore attention to him
you automatically curve with the curve if you maintain height and level.
who Hamburger?