Message from @Akhanyatin
Discord ID: 603652256533053470
wdym
here's another interview with another ex nasa employee for those interested
i'm guessing he wasn't fired because he "dubunked" round earth
it's because flat earthers shouldn't be in nasa
just listen to him talk and make up your own mind
they're the ones laughing at you
ok buddy
so, it's ironic you guys laughing
if you really want to talk about who's laughing at who, more than 90 percent of people are round-earthers
then it's more than 90percent that are being laughed at
This guy is self taught and he's a painter
the question is who's laughing is justified
self taught?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
honestly i'm not getting into a debate with another flat earther
yes, he's a painter
i'll probably get muted
He doesnt even want to answer what his profession was
yeah, whatever he's talking about, he didn't learn it in school
he does,, he was a freelance painter and photo manipulator
If you deny blatant evidence and create a diversion to proof there is a good chance you're causing problems
What even are you talking about?
Why would curvature have to be taken into account??
^
If you make sure your structure is level, that's curvature taken into account.
Moving with the spin, but no curving with the curve?
Also if he talks about curpuscular sun rays then I'm not going to pay anymore attention to him
you automatically curve with the curve if you maintain height and level.
who Hamburger?
the person talking to you
Which the bridge doesn't
look guys, we don't have to debate no one
so they did not level the bridge ever?
just wait a few decades or so and space comercial flight will be available
the bridge looks like it alters height for aesthetic purposes...
The bridge is constant even in photo
@carlito the painter
No curvature on it
dude. that argument has already been said 100 times