Message from @Akhanyatin
Discord ID: 603653112296767498
This guy is self taught and he's a painter
the question is who's laughing is justified
self taught?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
honestly i'm not getting into a debate with another flat earther
yes, he's a painter
i'll probably get muted
He doesnt even want to answer what his profession was
yeah, whatever he's talking about, he didn't learn it in school
He was hired as a painter
he does,, he was a freelance painter and photo manipulator
If you deny blatant evidence and create a diversion to proof there is a good chance you're causing problems
What even are you talking about?
Why would curvature have to be taken into account??
^
If you make sure your structure is level, that's curvature taken into account.
Moving with the spin, but no curving with the curve?
Also if he talks about curpuscular sun rays then I'm not going to pay anymore attention to him
you automatically curve with the curve if you maintain height and level.
who Hamburger?
Which the bridge doesn't
look guys, we don't have to debate no one
so they did not level the bridge ever?
just wait a few decades or so and space comercial flight will be available
the bridge looks like it alters height for aesthetic purposes...
The bridge is constant even in photo
@carlito the painter
No curvature on it
dude. that argument has already been said 100 times
you asked for an example of a nasa employee.. it seems that you were just asking for the sake of asking since it's obvious you aren't going to watch it
I never asked
Globe heads always deny proof
well, yeah. Why on earth would the height change to compensate for curvature?
i was talking to Nick
and no, he doesn't mention curpuscular rays
i'm actually going to commit not alive
there's no method to educate a flat earther without them calling you brainwashed sheep
you tend to forget that we were all originally educated the same way you were
the difference is that we are now questioning it