^

If you make sure your structure is level, that's curvature taken into account.

Moving with the spin, but no curving with the curve?

Also if he talks about curpuscular sun rays then I'm not going to pay anymore attention to him

you automatically curve with the curve if you maintain height and level.

who Hamburger?

the person talking to you

Which the bridge doesn't

look guys, we don't have to debate no one

so they did not level the bridge ever?

just wait a few decades or so and space comercial flight will be available

the bridge looks like it alters height for aesthetic purposes...

The bridge is constant even in photo

@carlito the painter

No curvature on it

dude. that argument has already been said 100 times

you asked for an example of a nasa employee.. it seems that you were just asking for the sake of asking since it's obvious you aren't going to watch it

I never asked

Globe heads always deny proof

well, yeah. Why on earth would the height change to compensate for curvature?

i was talking to Nick

and no, he doesn't mention curpuscular rays

i'm actually going to commit not alive

there's no method to educate a flat earther without them calling you brainwashed sheep

you tend to forget that we were all originally educated the same way you were

the difference is that we are now questioning it

And realizing it's full if falsehoods and fake pictures, cgi, etc

who's to say we didn't question the model

we just came to the conclusion that the earth is indeed round

Because you are still deceived

so you performed your own unique experiments then

ok buddy

#woke eh

tell us, , how did you come to the conclusion that gravity is indeed the way they describe it

You "questioned" but are mainstream <:lul:484994724118134784>

I can appreciate the questioning of what you've been told. It's not a bad thing to learn and make sure of information you've been told.

why are you using my roles as an argument

the guy names precisely 0 sources to his claims

he does name source

just from off-brand ones