@qwerty.bb here: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1120.pdf

you're the one denying real science in favor of fake tricks

You guys just can't see the truth

@Bibleman https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque

You avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - you answered criticism with criticism.

you constantly try acting like a good intelligent debater when you're the one that denies real evidence and uses fake evidence

here's a rock, therefore metoer"

Exactly

I tried

i really did

you guys can read this if you want: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1120.pdf

Im sorry you can't accept the truth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeE1gnIsK_Y

It must be hard

From the conclusion: Large variations of shielding
depths between samples indicate that break-up of the
meteoroid must have occured high in atmosphere. This
would also explain the large inferred ablation loss,
which is typical for large chondrite showers.

@mineyful f

don't know how you can keep denying the science

I'm not denying anything

no bibleman

well kinda you too since you said there was no proof of them being real

when this paper was on the examination of a meteorite

The thing is why would the government and other organizations pay large sums of money for a meteorite if it's just a normal rock

there's a fallacy in there and that's weak argument

but i'm not in the mood to tear apart things rn

I gotta pack

DC time

I know it's weak but I'm just asking to prod answers

make it stronger

don't generalize it so much

Kk I'll think of something

at the end of the day i'm still here and I'm still looking for answers

it's part of the deception, the money is just for show to pull the deception off

the government is in on it, money has no real value

that was bait bibleman

also any more questions on the meteorites

Yeet

there are no questions, they aren't real

and why is that

you deny evidence in favor of heresay

so what's the new popular consensus on what they are