going to buy a rock

lol

There's no proof they're real

bibleman you got anymore questions on the validity of this meteorites

they aren;t valid

And there's no proof the earth is round

meteorites and metoers aren't valid

sigh

can't help denial I tried

It's not denial

@qwerty.bb here: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1120.pdf

you're the one denying real science in favor of fake tricks

You guys just can't see the truth

@Bibleman https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque

You avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - you answered criticism with criticism.

you constantly try acting like a good intelligent debater when you're the one that denies real evidence and uses fake evidence

here's a rock, therefore metoer"

Exactly

I tried

i really did

you guys can read this if you want: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1120.pdf

Im sorry you can't accept the truth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeE1gnIsK_Y

It must be hard

From the conclusion: Large variations of shielding
depths between samples indicate that break-up of the
meteoroid must have occured high in atmosphere. This
would also explain the large inferred ablation loss,
which is typical for large chondrite showers.

@mineyful f

don't know how you can keep denying the science

I'm not denying anything

no bibleman

well kinda you too since you said there was no proof of them being real

when this paper was on the examination of a meteorite

The thing is why would the government and other organizations pay large sums of money for a meteorite if it's just a normal rock

there's a fallacy in there and that's weak argument

but i'm not in the mood to tear apart things rn

I gotta pack

DC time

I know it's weak but I'm just asking to prod answers

make it stronger

don't generalize it so much

Kk I'll think of something