Message from @Citizen Z
Discord ID: 587779398162317493
Again, life also thrived in the marianas trench.
doesn’t mean humans can live down there
Yes exactly
Life thrives because of co2
I agree with you @Citizen Z
As global warming is not what it seems
@Citizen Z do you not believe hat co2 in large quantities is toxic to humans
Co2 said
Hoes mad
My mom told me that co2 hoes mad
The earth is flat.
Agent Smith is gay
Morpheus is gay
v
We are only at .04%
50% increase would be .06%
Well within human limitations
We can handle 1.0%
The "survey" was a two-question, online questionnaire sent to 10,257 earth scientists, of whom [only] 3,146 responded. Not content with such a distorted sample, the researchers then selected 79 of their sample and declared them "experts."
Of those 79 scientists, two were excluded from a second supplementary question. So 75 out of 77 made it through to the final round, and 97.4 per cent were found to agree with "the consensus". That's where the 97 per cent comes from.
shows you how they manipulate the numbers to push a agenda
So this is a very Michael Mann "reconstruction": just as a couple of Californian bristlecones can determine the climate for a millennium, so a couple of dozen Californian scientists can determine the consensus of the world.
Wow, you mean the 97% consensus number comes from just 75 scientists that were hand-picked from an email survey?
Yep. Out of the hundreds of thousands of scientists in the world, only 75 of them were selected to "count" for the climate change survey that every mainstream media news organization quotes as FACT.
Not quite the "settled science" you've been told, is it? In fact, it all looks rather shoddy.
By contrast, over 30,000 scientists have signed a petition challenging the climate change narrative.
so more scientist claim it is a HOAX than says it is real hahahaha
A staggering 30,000+ scientists have come forward confirming that man-made climate change is a hoax perpetuated by the elite in order to make money.
The science is clearly not settled, and banning people from talking about it, based on evidence, is not only unethical, but... unscientific.
And, of course, there are the more than 31,487 American scientists (to date) who have signed a petition challenging the climate change narrative and 9,029 of them hold PhDs in their respective fields.
that is way more than 75 scientist they used for the study hahahaha
Okay
So
I see