Message from @ZeroT
Discord ID: 588102878116446210
We are only at .04%
50% increase would be .06%
Well within human limitations
Not even .1
We can handle 1.0%
The "survey" was a two-question, online questionnaire sent to 10,257 earth scientists, of whom [only] 3,146 responded. Not content with such a distorted sample, the researchers then selected 79 of their sample and declared them "experts."
Of those 79 scientists, two were excluded from a second supplementary question. So 75 out of 77 made it through to the final round, and 97.4 per cent were found to agree with "the consensus". That's where the 97 per cent comes from.
shows you how they manipulate the numbers to push a agenda
So this is a very Michael Mann "reconstruction": just as a couple of Californian bristlecones can determine the climate for a millennium, so a couple of dozen Californian scientists can determine the consensus of the world.
Wow, you mean the 97% consensus number comes from just 75 scientists that were hand-picked from an email survey?
Yep. Out of the hundreds of thousands of scientists in the world, only 75 of them were selected to "count" for the climate change survey that every mainstream media news organization quotes as FACT.
Not quite the "settled science" you've been told, is it? In fact, it all looks rather shoddy.
By contrast, over 30,000 scientists have signed a petition challenging the climate change narrative.
so more scientist claim it is a HOAX than says it is real hahahaha
A staggering 30,000+ scientists have come forward confirming that man-made climate change is a hoax perpetuated by the elite in order to make money.
The science is clearly not settled, and banning people from talking about it, based on evidence, is not only unethical, but... unscientific.
And, of course, there are the more than 31,487 American scientists (to date) who have signed a petition challenging the climate change narrative and 9,029 of them hold PhDs in their respective fields.
that is way more than 75 scientist they used for the study hahahaha
Okay
I see
All those plants and trees that require evil co2 need to go
Do you spend all day trying to get banned?
This never made any sense to me. We breathe out CO2 in O2. Plants love CO2. They thrive as it goes up. I have seen more and more plant life. Crops will grow faster with it. I simply can not see the damage more of it would do. A bit warmer would be wonderful for most of us. We could live further north.
hey @Citizen Z
Yes? @Hirohito's chins
how come i still cant speak in some of he channels
@Hirohito's chins you have to have new member role removed.
how do i got about doing that
How do you folks resolve the fact that major oil companies found proof of human-emission caused climate change and then deliberately spread misinformation to make people believe it was a hoax
Doesn’t it make much more sense that climate Change is real and that the denial of it is the conspiracy?
What would be the motive for scientists claiming climate change is real?
Do you think it compares at all to the clear and obvious profit motive that coal and oil companies have in hiding climate change?
I simply cannot understand how someone who claims to be a seeker of truth can be fooled by these corporations and their lies