Okay lol, so you have nothing that can analyze the attraction between 2 masses? You just know how these 2 masses move according to hubble law?

Or you get dense like 800 pound masses and a meter stick which is hard to get

And see now you’re making logical fallacies

The problem in trying to disprove gravity is that it is tied to several other theories and plays a big role in the model currently accepted by the scientific community, so disproving it doesn't mean to solely tackle it's existence but also the interactions it has with other theories (I don't know if I'm properly explaining my point, I apologize for the choice of words)

I simply told you that the process is complex and that if you want to better understand it you should look into it yourself

You followed up by telling me “oh yeah so it can’t be done”

Laziness does not equate to disproof

like for example that gravity created all planets and suns in the current model

You're main hypothesis was trying to prove gravity, you're the one with the logical fallacies here. Thank you for telling me that you can't analyze that 2 masses will attract each up other. Your response was disappointing

It can be done at home but its expensive

We literally told you you can

@rivenator12113 well then. If you'd like to say that the hypothesis she represented is wrong, then i would like you to present a hypothesis that is correct.

I understand that you’re trying to dominate the argument through personal degradation but seriously all I did was invite you to look into a complex form of analysis and all you did was turn me down

Gravity is also tied to magnetism and some objects have clearly observable magnetic properties, you would also need to sever the ties between gravity and magnetism

You not wanting to actually do your research on something that’s too complex for me to explain just shows that your opinion is uninformed

Mate, he only told me how to 2 objects move according to Hubble law. I asked him how can we analyze and know that these 2 objects attracted each other then he dodged into oblivion.

I didn’t dodge the question

You want to know how it’s done?

You said do it for yourself and we have too many equations

I gave you the set ups

Did they not literally explain how to do so?

Yeah because reality is complex

Just admit you can't lol

I don’t have thousands of astrophysics equations ready to spout off to you in a snap

Just because you’re too lazy to look into it doesn’t mean that it’s impossible

It doesnt even take astrophysics

First it was '' too many equations in physics can give you an answer '' then '' reality is complex ''

Not having the time =/= can’t do it

I’m making the same point

Lmfao you guys say its so easy but can't even explain it

I have a question does Foucalt pendulum prove spin of the earth

I didn’t say it was easy

I said it was *possible*

Youre literally ignoring me

when did anyone state it's easy?

Give me a straight answer please or just admit you can't with the scientific method @Arachidamia

You told me you can with the scientific method, I want something reproducible 1 to 1

I tell you the experimental set up and you don't listen and repeatably asj

My straight answer would take a whole essay’s worth of research and writing

We stated multiple times that it's complex and it's because reality is complex. Nothing in this world is a straight a+b=c

You can’t ask that of me when you are too lazy to even look up a single word yourself