atmosphere water sticking to globe all from one experiment

Has anyone ever tried Cavendish expiremment within a vacuum? It doesn't even the same results within the same environment, its a flawed scientific method.

No

not that I've heard of

Never even tried regular one

Other than what i had offered up but then i became a sidecast of the debate

Need to get rid of independent variables

Such as static

Or charge

I read something that also says vibrations around the experiment could be causing the motion

Interesting

Never thought of that

I mean if we are talking such a minute amount and it is attached to something...yeah

You also need a magnetically-shielded environment

lot of problems there

Well we have magnetic or statically affected attraction between salt grains and we also have it between dense lead balls in fairness

@Akhanyatin half of "classical mechanics" is actually wrong, just so you know. And regardless, you asking me to prove an understanding would require you to understand the concepts so that you could claim that I don't.

@97 Eleven I think your logic with the implication of the difficulty of unifying general relativity with quantum mechanics is terrible.

Hello

is this flat earth argue chamber

i love it

We're humans and physics is really difficult, us having some problems with theory still is not an argument that you need to replace a spherical earth with a flat one.

These high class arguments

I enjoy

i dont understand how do people think the earth is flat if every "Proof" has been debunked like nONi

its 4:44 boiz

Your girl on that track she sound better than better than you someone dissed me I don’t know I’m like who

``` Has anyone ever tried Cavendish expiremment within a vacuum? It doesn't even the same results within the same environment, its a flawed scientific method. ```
Oh yes, of-course we have. @rivenator12113

Guess how many torsion bar setups are used, just in Hungary alone, for prospecting minerals?

@Albert Einstein "difficulty" I'd say impossibility. The einstein-hilbert field equations can't be quantised, any attempt of peturbative theory on gravity fails.

sup

@97 Eleven Yeah so we need some new way to unify our observations about gravity, space and time with QM.

And that might be really hard to do.

And the fact that it is really hard does not make a flat earth more likely at all.

You know a flat earth has implications for every single part of physics as we know it, if the earth really is flat almost all of physics will be changed in so many ways.

Like a foucault pendulum for instance with a latitude dependant precession rate. Are you gonna invent a new force to explain that?

And is that new force compatible with all of QFT?

And now the eotvos effect, are you gonna invent a new force to explain that too? And the same question applies to that?

How about tides? A new force there too?

The list goes on.

See, arguments between flat earth and globe earth theory will always be biased because the models are simply too far from each other and lay on totally different foundations, discussions opposing two completely different understandings of modern physics will only reach an understanding when people get tired of arguing and leave