I'm leaving too

Ok...

Bye.

Nice debate

Sorry citizen z

All good brother

Can't even proof his scientific method. Fool

bye

Tchüss as the germans say it

Cya

I’m sure some of you are nice people and i don’t want to judge you on one disagreement

Lets not call ppl fools

So I guess the old phrase reigns supreme once more

We are investigating together. Not against eachother

Let’s agree to disagree

farewell

Sorry milord, I shall not make that mistake

Science is fun to explore

Dont make it not fun

Even more fun when they can't explain how gravity works. All their arguments are based on if gravity already exists lol

It's so fun to see them get mad when I question

I still can't believe cavendish is the only experiment they offer for gravity

Lol wow <:butthurt:507983822244151306> ❄ @Arachidamia#0592

They offer more but its exclusive to space experiments

atmosphere water sticking to globe all from one experiment

Has anyone ever tried Cavendish expiremment within a vacuum? It doesn't even the same results within the same environment, its a flawed scientific method.

No

not that I've heard of

Never even tried regular one

Other than what i had offered up but then i became a sidecast of the debate

Need to get rid of independent variables

Such as static

Or charge

I read something that also says vibrations around the experiment could be causing the motion

Interesting

Never thought of that

I mean if we are talking such a minute amount and it is attached to something...yeah

You also need a magnetically-shielded environment

lot of problems there

Well we have magnetic or statically affected attraction between salt grains and we also have it between dense lead balls in fairness

@Akhanyatin half of "classical mechanics" is actually wrong, just so you know. And regardless, you asking me to prove an understanding would require you to understand the concepts so that you could claim that I don't.