Message from @Akhanyatin
Discord ID: 607252166834520098
@Akhanyatin Baseless claims and assertions
The thing is their entire argument is based on saying gravity doesn't exist
If gravity can be proved then all arguments against will become invalid
Whether gravity exists or not, is irrelevant wtv replaces it will still assert that the earth is a globe. My whole point is that trying to prove flat earth using advanced notions like gravity won't work since you still can't explain simple notions. Start by explaining simple notions, then try to escalate to gravity. If your model of flat earth only addresses gravity, it's still going to be an inaccurate model since it explains nothing else.
>Whether gravity exists or not, is irrelevant wtv replaces it will still assert that the earth is a globe
False, you need gravity in order for a globe to exist or water will slide off it.
Well we observe stuff falling down towards the ground, including water and gas. If the earth is a sphere then the falling direction changes direction as you go around it, if it's flat it doesn't.
@rivenator12113 no because the next theory will still make it fall towards the globe. Disproving gravity doesn't magically change the way everything else works, it just replaces it by something that enables us to understand why things fall towards the earth. It doesn't mean the earth magically becomes flat since we have many other ways to prove it's a globe.
@Akhanyatin dude, what I'm saying is that if we prove gravity then the flat earth argument will fall apart
Because if gravity does exist that means we'll all fly towards the center of the disc if it was a flat earth
Oh, I misunderstood, but what I'm saying is that gravity is way too high level, you don't need to prove gravity, you only need to use simple maths, simple observations etc...
One of the premises of the flat Earth theory is that gravity doesn't exist
And if they just say it doesn't exist without saying why we can't really explain it exists now can we?
Ok but, even with gravity being the main reason GE works, gravity doesn't explain why star maps in the north and south are different. Gravity doesn't explain seasons and time zones and day/night cycles etc
>gravity doesn't magically change the way everything else works, it just replaces it by something that enables us to understand why things fall towards the earth. It doesn't mean the earth magically becomes flat since we have many other ways to prove it's a globe
You need to prove gravity in order for globe earth to exist.
actually, no, you just need to look at the sky
you need gravity to understand why it's a globe and why things don't fall off it.
If you can prove gravity, globe earth would be factual and flat earth wouldn't work.
Flat earth doesn't work, just look at the sun and moon
That doesn't prove gravity
Who care about gravity? You can't match observations from a flat plane to observations in real life.
Red herring lol
nope, your model can't explain things, mine can, mine is more accurate.
Red herring once again, every time you lose you switch to another subject. Aren't you tired of it?
I haven't changed subject yet, my whole point is that even if gravity can be disproven, whatever replaces it, will also take into consideration that the earth is a globe since gravity is not the only way to prove the earth is a globe.
Flat earth could work with gravity people are just way too lazy ti figure it out
Flat earth can't work with gravity.......
It can
why is the sun in the sky on a flat earth?
Where is the center of gravity on a flat earth?
Its being held there by a pole
why has no one ever crashed into that pole?
Depends on how its mass is spread out
>haven't changed subject yet, my whole point is that even if gravity can be disproven, whatever replaces it, will also take into consideration that the earth is a globe since gravity is not the only way to prove the earth is a globe.
False, you need gravity in order for globe earth to work. Water always its seek level
Because noone has ever flown to the sun
A pole to the top of the dome
There are several other problems with flat earth maybe
But it could still coincide with gravity
True, but he was discussing that you don't need gravity in order for a globe earth to exist
False, you don't need gravity for a globe earth, we currently have a theory and it's called gravity, replacing it with another theory doesn't change the shape of the earth, therefore, the new theory will still predict that water will stick to the globe. since, again, there are other ways to prove a globe, you won't make any other shape work with the next theory.
You're assuming globe earth already exists.