Message from @zirpu
Discord ID: 608090582526459905
Yes, historical evidence shows that stars have moved, when comparing the earliest meticulous star charts
@rivenator12113 You can't see orion in your sky right now, but you could months ago. What does that tell you?
@zirpu You can see the polaris star everyday, what does that tell you?
That it is the star nearest to earths celestial pole
Polaris isnt even on the direct celestial pole
Earth rotates around the sun, what does that tell you?
The sky rotates equatorially. I think you need to research that a bit.
Sun moves in a direction what does that tell you?
Nothing in the sky contradicts with the heliocentric model. You aren't making sense.
So why can't you see orion anymore if we are on a flat earth?
Yes it does contradicts the heliocentric model, the earth rotating around the sun which moves in a direction can not work with polaris. Only way polaris can remain in the same spot for millenials is because earth is stationery
I don't really think it's worth your time to argue against the heliocentric model if you don't understand how it works.
What did I say wrong about the heliocentric model? Everything that I wrote is factual
"Only way polaris can remain in the same spot for millenials is because earth is stationery" This is false, it could also be because the star is far away.
Why do I always get the same NPC response, you globe earthers keep forgetting that earth is rotating on its own axis around the sun which moves in a straight path, we should never see the polaris star everyday within those conditions
Stars actual movement based on our movement through the galaxy is negligable because of the scale. Only star movement we see without careful observation is from earths rotation.
Because of the scale
Do you keep forgetting about your heliocentric model?
earth is rotating on its own axis around the sun which moves in a straight path, we should never see the polaris star everyday within those conditions
And its axis, tilt, points at polaris.
That would work on a geocentric flat earth not on a heliocentric globe earth
Go research it and come back
I can't research it for you
while its moving around the sun? The sun which also moves in a path?
Scale
You are forgetting the scale we are looking at
Stars are so far the only movement weve noticed in them is the stars that are closest like Barnards star. And its movement is tiny over years and years.
And? You have an object moving on it axis which moves around the another object. How would it see the same object everyday? The fact that it's so far away and stationery just reinforces flat earth geocentrism
Do I have to draw it for you or can you research it yourself?
Even if you can't understand this thing there are many simpler things we can discuss that debunk your theory.
Lmfao, its your own model that makes no sense. The fact that its so far away, which you admitted, proves that the earth is stationery and geocentric.
Stars are far away so earth is flat?
Do you know how many flat earth articles I have read
And most of them have false information
So what does that say about this theory
Star is far away and appears in the same spot every night thus the earth is flat and geocentric. If the earth was moving around the sun we would never see Polaris in the same spot everyday
@_Ciprian There are many flat earth sabotagers be careful
Okay