Message from @bait
Discord ID: 615055481471238154
but i'm pretty skeptical
Simulation is about as safe as agnosticism
Because you dont have anything to defend
well, i just think hard solipsism has no solution
I come from a position of basic deduction
Not assuming values
i'd accept it so long as the premises are valid and the form is valid
Example
Do ypu experience a level plane all day every day?
Huh
yes rigg, i do
Well that I disagree with
Does the sun look and act like stars?
no
Human perception is just too weak to say that you experience earth as flat in your everyday life
the sun's a lot bigger and brighter
and i've never seen a star in front of a sun
while a star can go behind the sun
Do the planets look an act like the floor you stand on?
i dunno what you mean by that
Its rhetorical
Correct
Have you ever experienced attraction to center of mass?
does the earth count?
Is it an assumed value or an experienced one?
it's an attributed explanation
based on inductive data
I for example experience a linear downward acceleration
me too
But adding center of mass is the assumption
So the model is asserting two ideas into one
i dont think to call it an assumption is accurate
there is empirical evidence from satellite data
and fact that the horizon moves when you are in a car and you drive
Im coming from an emperical deduction
Thats what this exercise is
have you ever been in a car?
You don't experience a flat earth, you assume it.
You experience a locally relatively flat earth in short distances
saying the globe theory is too small to observe doesn't change the fact that we don't observe it