lmao

damn it

Naughty boy

has anyone else noticed that when they introduced vaccines, the rates of autism have also gone up as well?

Yea

Have you ever noticed that as ice cream sales go up so do shark attacks

why are you trolling?

Its simple statistics

Also the best example that corraltion doesnt necessary mean causation

I believe the argument for this was that, at the time, autism had a rather loose diagnosis. The rates weren't going up as much as people were actually being properly diagnosed with the disorder.

idk from what ive seen, vaccines don't seem to do much, diseases were already on the decline when they introduced them, and now all of a sudden rates of autism are so much higher

i see

maybe people started believing in fe at the same time vaccines came out

I don't necessarily believe FE, I just think it's closer to my personal observations, the only problem I see with it is that I can't figure out how the sun and moon work on FE, which is why I'm on the fence

@Seeker of Truth showed a pretty convincing graph related to vaccines, maybe he can explain it better than me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcHPmVxtFw8

@WonTon graph or evidence? just cause there are pretty lines with colors and numbers means it's right

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/625675284212875275/VaccineGraphs2.png

seems pretty clear to me

no source.

i agree with it

but there is no source

Seeker posted it in <#484514023698726912> earlier today, I thought it was interesting, not sure where it's from though

Those are deaths rates and not contraction rates

Vaccines don't eradicate. They protect us from them.

Like Sam said, those are death rates and that's an important distinction.

To put it in another perspective, more people are surviving cancer now than we did 100 years ago, that does not me we don’t need to look into cures or better ways to fight it.

@WonTon Those stats are deceiving, do you have a statistic for vaccines population rate timeline? I'm pretty sure back in the 1950s people weren't widely vaccinated. Rather it was due to society getting cleaner as a whole and progressing with better medical accessibility.

sure but it just seems to me that the death rates were already on the decline to the point of almost being gone, so people saw this opportunity to introduce vaccines saying that it will achieve what was already being achieved anyways

https://ourworldindata.org/vaccination I was right, in the 1980 vaccination rate was only 20% it must've been way lower in 1950s so why would you attribute the eradication of these viruses to vaccination?

so my point is that vaccines didn't contribute to anything

so why introduce them if not for nefarious purposes

When you see the anti vaxx kid using an aging app, *insert looking away meme template*

But then how do you explain the fact that ever since vacations have gone on decline there have been more disease outbreaks

And the comeback of polio

Why don’t you compare death rates in the US and Canada to countries without access to vaccinations?

if

@pphands here

the problem is if you have a poor country with unsanitary conditions, you're bound to have diseases

it has nothing to do with having vaccines or not