Yabai, your low IQ means science is out of your grasp, sorry kid 🙂

😂

That is an ad hominem attack...ouch. I never intended to insult anyone's intelligence here, but thanks for showing me that you break the very rules you're supposed to enforce...

No, you clearly do not understand science, an yet you try to use it, your assumptions show youre lacking the IQ to know when youre wrong!

Let me know if you want to cry more..ill be avoiding it

Once again, insulting me. IQ is a test based on one's ability to solve puzzles, it doesn't have much to do with actual intelligence.

Oh it does, an its 80% genetically inherited

but science int your thing, move along

It's been proven to not be a very accurate test anyway.

try knitting or sumink else, k

So because you scored low its not a vlaid test, oh okay 😄

So, if I'm the one being insulted, I'm crying about it, but if someone you don't like has an opposing opinion, it's a real ad hominem. Interesting.

No, I had a score of 136. It's not a very accurate test regardless.

Stating a fact is not an insult, its just what I have gleaned from our conversing here 🙂

What does my intelligence have to do with this argument, here?

If someone is wrong in an argument, it doesn't give you a pass to call them unintelligent.

Without intelligence you cannot scieence, ipso facto 🙂

🤦

If you were intelligent, maybe you would realize the way you spell sentences is extremely obnoxious.

^ that is an ad hominem attack.

How about none of us uses these from now on?

Anyway, anymore assumptions you have?

Nope, I have many, many more.

Wow his last comment, real high IQ their bud 😄 😛

When you resort to making memes in a channel called civil debate..

<:cool:507986727953235970>

Thats not a meme tho, k

sigh!

...That is a meme by every definition

Hmmmmmm, not every picture with words is a meme dude, geez

s-l-o-w-l-a-n-e-!

@Yabai Thank you for writing in detail, I already know the argument of '' everything moves with the atmosphere at a constant speed thus it makes appear like it's stationery ''. What my problem is, according to the globe theory if there's boat and it sails straight it curves downright correct and appears to sink top to bottom? Yet if an airplane flies straight the same thing does not happen. The airplane does not gain altitude when the curve is right beneath it.

That has to do with the way we see the boat. The boat does indeed sink past the horizon...boats don't need to weigh down the front part of the ship in order to follow the curve of the earth, do they? It's the same for airplanes, they naturally follow a path around the earth without need for the pilots to do anything.

Goal post moved.

Ok.

Ever heard of optical slant? @Yabai

How was that a goal post move? I'm basically saying the same thing I said before, but in clearer terms.

You were talking motion

How come we can still se aeroplanes an not ships then, hmmmmmmmmmmm.......

Now you are talking curvature and obstruction