but

wouldnt you think any ships at all would've fallen off the edge

"tests"

research in colege, actually

The "Ice wall"

Dont you think

We would ever see that

Thats all you guys say, "GO do this and come back"

Give it to me here.

that is literally switched...

you guys pickout one thing i have said and spend all your time on that

sadly this friendly dispute must end at this moment, for i have an exam tommorow. This isn;t a sign of giving up, I will give my facts tomorrow.

birb

uh

Nice FES meme ^

you guys always seem to champion around that laser

@Deleted User gotta have temp control

✅

not yet

mathieus, i've explained to you multiple times why you're wrong, why do you keep posting the exact same things?

Hello other flat earth believers

The cause of rotation of torsion balance in Cavendish experiment. Although the cause of rotation of torsion balance has not been investigated yet, the Cavendish experiment is used as proof for the law of universal gravitation and to calculate the gravitational constant. However, it is not difficult to verify that the real cause of the rotation of torsion balance is not gravitational force, but the interaction of two pairs of masses - systems of duality, as it is shown on the picture. In the first column, combinations of pairs of masses and torsion balance which can cause the rotation are shown. The first combination at top left corresponds to the Cavendish experiment. The rotation of torsion balance can take place even when the masses are on one line with the masses of torsion balance, which does not correspond to the concept of the force of gravity at all. All the combinations in which one mass is removed from the experiment do not cause rotation, therefore, the Cavendish experiment with one mass and torsion balance contradicts the law of universal gravitation. The insertion of the second mass can cause rotation again.

I see that is very interesting other flat earther

heh mathieus, i spent a whole hour talking about experiments but you were ignoring me and saying "still waiting on experiments to prove blind faith" which 1) makes no sense since blind faith requires no experiments and 2) means you're just being dishonest. so who's actually trolling? it's ok, i didn't expect much from you anyways

it's not that I can't answer your questions, it's that you can't understand words

@Akhanyatin All you've been doing is rambling and debunking flat earth on the basis of globe earth model, where are the experiments that proves the sun is 93 millions miles away?

woosh

come on river, i sent a video already but you didn't understand it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V03eF0bcYno

Come on we all know that the earth is flat or else we would fall off

LOL wait what

You keep making those assertions

where are the evidence?

sun is 93 million miles away

i'm going to mark all your ad homs mathieus, maybe you'll be able to post one comment that's not an ad hom (or another fallacy)

prove to me the sun is 93 million miles away please, you know that for a fact why don't you provide evidence?

bunch of lies

river
1) watch the video
2) you can't have a local sun illuminating Antarctica 24/7 during southern summer

@rivenator12113 that picture has no context, if i recall, it was a picture to show the difference in size

@Akhanyatin https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/44194356 What happened, don't you believe in those space agencies?