so the west wants oil but a leader's in the way so they're choosing oil and big terrorism over moderate terrorism?

Just because you are the best shit doesn't mean you aren't a shit

@Heliodromus Shingen Muh barrel bombs

@TopHatt Since when do the leaders suffer the effects of the violence?

@TopHatt No, under Assad syria has been pretty terrorist free I think.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQjhMqV41zE

@TopHatt Any oil fields in syria have been bombed to hell or have been destroyed from artillery, there is no point in it anymore.

@TopHatt They don't care because they have bodyguards and bunkers.

Its the pipeline.

@🅱arD
violation of basic rights is terroristic enough for me

Well its not in western countries.

Thats what I thought you meant.

Are we going to witness the start of world war three this year?

>basic rights
>implying these even objectively exist

Because without assad we get terrorism here.

^

so basipally:

-Assad, but no oil
or
-ISIS, but oil

yes

Ah yes

@TopHatt Yep pretty much.

How about none of it

muh oil argument

Not even that, its just cheaper oil for Europe.

how about the united states gets oil money and we get a threat to unite against?

Son of a bitch man, this is happening again

i don't see a problem with more oil and fighting isis

...

RUSSIA

@TopHatt >Implying that assad likes the US

THATS THE PROBLEM

???

FUCKING RUSSIA

what about russia?

DOESN'T WANT

Also the MIC or Military Industrial Complex

US TO DISPOSE THEIR ALLY

@🅱arD Russia is the only thing keeping assad alive.

SO SUADIS

CAN ASS RAPE THEM ECONOMICALLY

THATS THE FUCKING PROBLEM

Assad likes anyone that isn't coming into his country and ruining everything

Why would he like the US, who are arming rebels to fight against him, leaving him also open to ISIS attacks?