on children

@Heliodromus Shingen What about iraq and iran?

95% chance it was the rebels.

Iraq has been done since Hussein was taken out, and Iran still funds various terror groups

Or Assad and his people are super incompetent

can anyone suggest a page that will give me the rundown on syria?

/sg/ on /pol/ is probably going fucking nuts

I really dont know why people are hating him, he is just finish the middle east.

Tfw you bomb a hospital and gas people but the blame goes to syria and the US invades and sets up your gov as the new one http://i.alalam.ir/news/Image/original/2013/08/25/alalam_635130223997873316_25f_4x3.jpg

@TopHatt Ultra quick rundown is that Assad's bad but the alternatives are worse for the syrians and for a terrorist free west, but Assad is freindly with russia. (((Powerful people))) want to build a pipeline to Europe through syria from the middle east, which would make russia uncompetative as an oil suplier. Assad is against this. So the (((Powerful people))) want to remove him.

*REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE*

Either "kurdistan" is going to be set up or FSA will.

How can Assad be bad when that region isn't going to spawn anything good to begin with?

so the west wants oil but a leader's in the way so they're choosing oil and big terrorism over moderate terrorism?

Just because you are the best shit doesn't mean you aren't a shit

@Heliodromus Shingen Muh barrel bombs

@TopHatt Since when do the leaders suffer the effects of the violence?

@TopHatt No, under Assad syria has been pretty terrorist free I think.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQjhMqV41zE

@TopHatt Any oil fields in syria have been bombed to hell or have been destroyed from artillery, there is no point in it anymore.

@TopHatt They don't care because they have bodyguards and bunkers.

Its the pipeline.

@🅱arD
violation of basic rights is terroristic enough for me

Well its not in western countries.

Thats what I thought you meant.

Are we going to witness the start of world war three this year?

>basic rights
>implying these even objectively exist

Because without assad we get terrorism here.

^

so basipally:

-Assad, but no oil
or
-ISIS, but oil

yes

Ah yes

@TopHatt Yep pretty much.

How about none of it

muh oil argument

Not even that, its just cheaper oil for Europe.

how about the united states gets oil money and we get a threat to unite against?

Son of a bitch man, this is happening again

i don't see a problem with more oil and fighting isis

...

RUSSIA