Shows exactly what we expect

2 sek

Yeah it is. And the predictions does not match

thats the first thing i asked you for. There is a reason math is always left out of "curvature proofs".

Because every single prediction fails.

You can see it at 35k ft
So why can I see the curve at 33k ft

@Albert Einstein I read everything you write with a German accent in my head.

http://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=Flat%2DEarth%3A+Finding+the+curvature+of+the+Earth

Let me give another screenshot

It goes against your model

Oof

its funny how most globers asks for math regarding everything. Except when they think they have "proofs for curvature in pictures". They never want their mathematical predictions beside that 😄

It doesn't

2 sek

lol. pull those data into http://metabunk.org/curve

@Albert Einstein 's 3rd img: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/609044036971659265/609046969075105804/J4.PNG

Now, I need to know the FOV of the camera to get a good comparison

? http://metabunk.org/curve its even maintained by a glober

@Albert Einsteinno you dont

Ofcourse you do

@Heider exactly

You tell the earth is mostly flat

With a lower FOV camera there will be less visible curve

So the horizon is curved at altitude

of course you need the FOV

Quite clearly with a good basic analysis

Albert a camera will always display curvature

And if you do the math it also checks out

It doesnt.

then you would have it accompanying it

I do

The walt bislin simulation

You can look at the equations if you want

I also have another example of those calcs if you want

so whats the height and whats the distance?

https://flatearthinsanity.blogspot.com/2016/08/flat-earth-follies-high-altitude.html

i can see height in the img.

The Bislin shot was at about 10km height or 33000 feet

I did that in 2 seconds btw, we can do it more accurately

no. i mean what Jtolan observed