Pathfinder before adjusting colors: http://mars.nasa.gov/MPF/ops/sol30S55.gif

Pathfinder after adjusting colors: http://mars.nasa.gov/MPF/ops/82938.gif

Color Palette and flag mars Before color adjusting: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA01522_modest.jpg

Color Palette and flag on Mars after color adjusting: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA00565_modest.jpg

Color Palette and flag mars Before color adjusting: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA01522_modest.jpg

Color Palette and flag on Mars after color adjusting: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA00565_modest.jpg

But check the colors on the nasa.gov images i linked.

@chairismati8 i7899 Clue is that if there are rodents on the pictures. it just shows that the pictures was taken on earth.

with a red filter.

@chairismati8 i7899
Color Palette and flag mars Before color adjusting: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA01522_modest.jpg

Color Palette and flag on Mars after color adjusting: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA00565_modest.jpg

@chairismati8 i7899 so comment those images instead. Notice how the american flag and the color palette is all messed up when "mars" has the red tint.

lol. Look at the url 😃

its from nasa.gov

@chairismati8 i7899 Look at the images i linked from nasa.gov. When the American Flag and the Color palette has real colores. The world is not "red" (red filter is not applied)

its just a red filter.

thats all it takes to scam the world.

@chairismati8 i7899 So why then is the colors all messed up on the american flag and the palette on the "mars" pictures?

Its as if they applied a red filter to entire image.. Isnt that weird?

@chairismati8 i7899 Lol so lack of atmosphere changes the color specter? How would you assert that to be happening?

Is the "nothing" filtering frequencies?

lol

@chairismati8 i7899 Because you were told so. Thats all you have. Its just faith.

You were told..

that was for charismati

Lol. exactly. So your argument is your faith in the authority you were told to trust during school.

Thats some great argument.

@Zummy Which one of mine are you talking about?

What argument are you talking about?

quote me

@Zummy So me pointing out that he has no argument is faith in your view?

I'm stating a fact. I have asked for proofs

he can only assert his faith

@chairismati8 i7899 You talk about pseudo scientists by definition. Most of what we were told was "scientists" during school does not follow the scientific method, and by definition they are then doing pseudo science.

@Zummy So you just invented that? Why are you lying?

@Zummy So i should just invent bs about you also then?

@chairismati8 i7899 But check the definition of "Pseudo science" and you will see that its those who pretend to do science but not following the scientific method.

so its by definition.

@Zummy No. You were explaining how you are clearvoyant and can tell people what they do.

Please explain that or admit that you lied.

@chairismati8 i7899 So just check the definition of Pseudo Science.

you will see.

No that is not correct

@chairismati8 i7899 Even Googling "definition pseudo science" gives:

pseudoscience /ˈsjuːdəʊˌsʌɪəns/
noun: pseudo-science
a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.
"the new pseudoscience of ‘counselling’"

@Zummy Because he was saying that "some guys" had done something. Which means that he has faith that these guys did as he was told.

When did i ever make such an argument exactly?

@Zummy I have observed the curve calculations to be wrong with my own eyes. The curvature obstruction cannot be found anywhere. Even though the math predicts it to be visible almost everywhere.

Water always finds its level. I have never ever observed curving larger bodies of water.

I dont have faith in anyone as i did when i was a glober.

Believing the "science" authorities etc.

Does not matter. We can see much further.

There is no curvature anywhere.

Equator is a property of the globe. If you want to define it as the midpoint between the tropics thats fine. But im not sure how you could measure that exactly. So how relevant to anything is it really?

@Human Sheeple Nice. ill note that down

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs0M0FJbKI4&t=4s

https://www.andoyaspace.no

https://youtu.be/bS4jPjs6JPw?t=16

New MH17 docu. only 28 min and contains a lot of good points.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkDWwYk4-Ho

@skeptik Its edited. Check this. Chopper going down: https://youtu.be/TaVdgNI0os4?t=784 (notice the flock of birds crossing in the bottom part of the view)

@skeptik Then notice how the same flock of birds crosses when the chopper goes back up: https://youtu.be/TaVdgNI0os4?t=838

@skeptik Again. the video is obviously edited. They have the same flock of birds crossing in the same way while chopper goes up and down. Why did they have to edite their video like that? Couldnt they just have recorded it without editing if this really happened?

@Edillon So the same flock of birds flew the exact same direction again when the chopper went up and when it came down?

Come on..

its obviously edited.

@skeptik so if you think you can see the curvature from sea level. Then why does Neil Degrasse Tyson explain how Felix Baumgartner had to "fake the curvature" with Fisheye Lenses / Wide angle lenses. Because as he says "You can't see the curvature from that height" (128 000 feet);

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-f63VAwZpo

But there are differences. Congress asked google spesifically how they would combat Flat Earth videos. Meanwhile "Ancient Aliens" conspiracies are promoted.

Space conspiracies in general.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1158337/ewton-wrong-science-dismiss-isaac-newton-theory-gravity-albert-einstein-black-hole

@KyostiNissinen Sorry i didn't see your question. But i'm not one of those deceiving* us. So i cannot really know for sure. i can only speculate. But for one, if they tell us the truth that explains everything right away. they cannot really change any narratives if they need that. If they give us nonsense they can just correct said nonsense in the direction they need us all to go. So a way to control the majority. Secondly if we all believe that we live on a ball. There would be no more area to explore. Its all explored from before. So its a form of a mental jail without them having to do much really. And thirdly. Nasa alone gets over 52 million usd per day from the tax payers.

Jesuits gave us Big Bang theory (George Le maitre)

These things what? @Robaticon

Sheeple 😉 how are you today?

@Robaticon What doesnt have anything in common?

but it does though?

@Robaticon If there isnt any curvature. Then there is no ball. Then the Assumed Radius that "space" and orbital mechanics relies upon is bunk. Etc etc

The fundamental part of everything in heliocentrism vanishes as long as you see there isnt any curvature nor any motions.

as the image says

So evolution and big bang theory are all out of the window.

Replace "vacuum of space" with "pink fairytale land"

and you will see how nonsensical that question is.

we have priests that claims to have gone to this pink fairytale land.

But that doesnt give it any validity. Its just claims.

pictures from a pink fairytale land?

"i wonder why"...

You cannot have gas pressure without a container. And ther is no rocket thrust in a vacuum. It has _nothing_ (per vacuum definition) to push off of.

"pulling it towards" ?

@Robaticon So then you are talking about a skateboard bowlingball example? You stand on a skateboard and throw away a bowling ball to gain momentum?

Point being. If you say that rockets propel itself because it throws out matter the other way. Then literally it has to throw away a lot of mass.

How that works on earth is that it pushes off of the atmosphere in addition to pushing away on the gas it already pushed out.

In vacuum you have none of these things.

only the first one.

throwing out substantial mass..

Lol

So you say it throws out energy on one side and propel itself the other way because of it? 😃

Do you have a demonstration?

Or is it just faith?

Gravity has never been proven. thats just more faith.

So please. Demonstrate it

Show me a demonstration of something in a vacuum throwing away energy to gain momentum.

Lol its your claim 😉