Message from @Albert Einstein
Discord ID: 609048749120946188
no. i mean what Jtolan observed
so we can find how much it should have been obstructed by the curvature you believe in
That's another topic
Isnt that what we are discussing? what you can see in the images you linked?
What I want us to agree to is that the horizon is curved at altitude
Globe Math is not supporting what you think those images show.
thats the point.
The calcs will match the horizon curve
Per walt bislin or many others
Every single prediction of the curvature have always failed.
Nope
It works great
Hence why no "curvature proof" has ever came with math alongside it.
Nope
Man you gotta be watching the wrong people then
I've seen hundreds of those
over the last years
So please show one.
Wow, well where to start
I hope Einstein is not a flatty
let me get you one of those
But first, do we agree that the horizon *looks* curved at high altitudes?
like the world record photo?
Or will you look more into that at least
Yeah, the 443 km one
Just need a smidge more refraction than standard refraction then it matches
A tiny increase
let me get you another one 2 sek
No bring that world record aswell
I dont remember it being "almost matching"
This actually matches perfectly
Have you looked at it yourself or heard analysis from people at 24/7`?
because their analysis is as always, crap,
I have observed things that should have been obstructed by the this invented curvature a lot of times myself
ANd yes i did check the world record with metabunk curve calc at least once
Incompetence at 24/7?? ***Surely not***
what about pictures from space
https://imgur.com/a/NeSI64e
https://imgur.com/AN6A2jp
```There is a mountain of evidence that the photographs
From space are doctored, or
Computer generated or staged in a film studio.
In an interview Rob Simmons even admitted the BLUE MARBLE
was photoshopped because it "had to be".```
You should check walt bislins refraction sim also