Message from @Edillon
Discord ID: 613058307917217818
@Flat Earth Subgenius it’s your fault you don’t understand rocket science
lol, i understand it the most
I guess it’s just too hard for you to wrap your mind around
and showed it
shame
@Anette stop being lazy and look up things for yourself for once instead of just being a naysaying troll.
You can't have an oxidizer in a vacuum, you would need immense amount of fuel just to thrust a bit
lol okay
you could literally see the Cog Dis watching FTFE answer my questions
exactly river
mmm no
@Anette Do you need some help?
you don’t understand
I can help you out.
the fuel would be vaporized immeaditaly , lol
sure, point me in the direction of some credible sources @Seeker of Truth
That would imply the fuel is not already vapor @Flat Earth Subgenius
@Anette bad you have to be taught how to use the internet
@Seeker of Truth it is what it is 🙃 🙂
The fuel would vaporize in a vacuum...
but it’s already vapor
Do you know what happens to a gaz form in a vacuum?
Also if it is liquid, the fuel is inside a tank and is not exposed to the vacuum until it becomes the the hot gas that causes thrust
The amount of fuel needed to even create the slightest movement would be ginormous...not to mention being able to steer.
but sheeple posted a gif of a tiny rocket engine providing thrust
I believe it was like &rocket
or something
Idk. Let’s try
I forget the command
&rocket
https://imgur.com/a/Y2kd1
What Thrust In A Vacuum!?
How can you fly in space if rockets produce negligible thrust in a vacuum chamber?
that’s thrust right there
You can see it moving, correct?
Like I said. That’s so slight. Negligible actually. Have fun getting to where you’re going. 🙄
It’s not negligible, it’s enough to propel it forward actually. Now imagine an engine over 1000 times larger with an incredible amount of fuel
The gif proves that rockets provide thrust in a vacuum
which is good enough for me
I rest my case