cool hypothetical

Same goes for the creator theory

the claim of randomness doesnt fit into the law of causality at all

Not a part of what I said was random.

Cause and effect.

as a matter of fact books have been written on this topic, because people have examined this and done the math on what the odds would be for everything to be random and occur the way they have

assuming that the random argument was true the calculations were done, and it was foinf to be impossible

found

But we are talking about the theory I just made here.

for example

signature in the cell

And, it is just as possible as the creator one.

randomness no

i just gave you an example of a book writtene xamining this topic

examining

1 sec

My theory with the black hole dosen't have randomness.

It's just cause and effect.

you did make the randomness argument, and the big bang does make the randomness argument

id like to share something if youre interested

its a video that breaks some things down and explains things and the odds of everything happening randomly

We moved on from that topic.

So what does that mean

all science and math

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYSmV2FlHDw

just examine the argument

And i thought everything happens to you for a reason

No randomness involved

I am now making the point that the law of casualty applies to pretty much everything, not just to the creator.

randomnes is in contradiction to the law of causality

The word Random is a highly mathematical term.

Doesnt really apply to us in real life

Am I just being ignored at this point?

no

Then please listen to what I am saying.

i am

So, your argument of the creation theory being correct is the law of casualty, correct?

if everything were sucked into a blackhole, where did existence go? are you saying something replaced it?

It would appear you didn't listen correctly.

i did

try to visualize it