you did make the randomness argument, and the big bang does make the randomness argument

id like to share something if youre interested

its a video that breaks some things down and explains things and the odds of everything happening randomly

We moved on from that topic.

So what does that mean

all science and math

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYSmV2FlHDw

just examine the argument

And i thought everything happens to you for a reason

No randomness involved

I am now making the point that the law of casualty applies to pretty much everything, not just to the creator.

randomnes is in contradiction to the law of causality

The word Random is a highly mathematical term.

Doesnt really apply to us in real life

Am I just being ignored at this point?

no

Then please listen to what I am saying.

i am

So, your argument of the creation theory being correct is the law of casualty, correct?

if everything were sucked into a blackhole, where did existence go? are you saying something replaced it?

It would appear you didn't listen correctly.

i did

try to visualize it

We listme but domt agree

Everything got compressed inside of the black hole, and, when it didn't have anything to suck, it started shrinking, compressing everything inside, compressing it to the point of blowing up and releasing the matter.

what would be surrounding the blackhole then?

nonexistenc?

Didn't I just say that it sucked everything?
Everything existing is inside of it.

then youre contradicting within the theory

compressed down to a single point yet surrounding everything that exists

and youre ignoring the point i made about nonexistence not existing in the place that everything had been prior to being sucked in

Listen, have you sucked all matter in a space?

your theory doesnt work

I asked, have you sucked all matter in a space?

thats really besides the point

i pointed out some flaws in your theory

It is really on the point.

Now, please answer.

Because, if you haven't, then I am pretty sure you can't prove your claim.

your question is distraction from what has been established. we both know that nonexistence doesnt exist, nor could it replace existence in a spacial sense, nor could everything be compressed into a single point with something surrounding it

Have you tried to do any of these things?