Message from @Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids
Discord ID: 621971649167884288
randomness doesnt
when does 2+2=5,037?
ever?
Here is a theory for you.
There was an universe, but there appeared a black hole, and it kept sucking matter, more and more and more matter, becoming bigger and bigger.
Slowly but surely, it ended up sucking up all the matter in the universe.
Then it only remained itself, and so it began sucking itself, becoming more and more compressed until....
Boom.
All the matter is released outside.
The universe begins a new.
Cause and effect.
cool hypothetical
Same goes for the creator theory
the claim of randomness doesnt fit into the law of causality at all
Not a part of what I said was random.
Cause and effect.
as a matter of fact books have been written on this topic, because people have examined this and done the math on what the odds would be for everything to be random and occur the way they have
assuming that the random argument was true the calculations were done, and it was foinf to be impossible
found
But we are talking about the theory I just made here.
for example
signature in the cell
And, it is just as possible as the creator one.
i just gave you an example of a book writtene xamining this topic
examining
1 sec
My theory with the black hole dosen't have randomness.
It's just cause and effect.
you did make the randomness argument, and the big bang does make the randomness argument
id like to share something if youre interested
its a video that breaks some things down and explains things and the odds of everything happening randomly
We moved on from that topic.
So what does that mean
all science and math
just examine the argument
And i thought everything happens to you for a reason
No randomness involved
I am now making the point that the law of casualty applies to pretty much everything, not just to the creator.
randomnes is in contradiction to the law of causality
The word Random is a highly mathematical term.
Doesnt really apply to us in real life
Am I just being ignored at this point?