Message from @MEE6

Discord ID: 623534826820993034


2019-09-17 15:01:41 UTC  

@Mathieus the Walking Witness weight of the balls

2019-09-17 15:01:44 UTC  

How many balls being used

2019-09-17 15:02:00 UTC  

If you can't change the weight or the amount being used than the experiment is shiat

2019-09-17 15:02:06 UTC  

Okay, genius. A scientist is testing the effect of light and dark on the behavior of moths by turning a light on and off. The independent variable is the amount of light and the moth's reaction is the dependent variable. So the experiment proves that moths are attracted to light based on circular reasoning? of course not. @Mathieus the Walking Witness

2019-09-17 15:02:07 UTC  

overexposure of the camera

2019-09-17 15:02:18 UTC  

<#538929818834698260>

2019-09-17 15:02:37 UTC  

@Mathieus the Walking Witness idk, Idc about the experiment I'm just saying it should be the independent variable

2019-09-17 15:02:44 UTC  

Those with a keen eye might of noticed two white dots to the right of the triangle shaped like crescents in both my photos and nasas footage ,ALONG WITH A RED TRIANGLE

2019-09-17 15:02:57 UTC  

what are the two crescent dots too

2019-09-17 15:03:01 UTC  

Gravity cannot be the independent variable in any experiment

2019-09-17 15:03:12 UTC  

@ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan u still a crackhead concaver?

2019-09-17 15:03:14 UTC  

Unless you plan on doing the experiment on earth and space

2019-09-17 15:03:21 UTC  

No, I am quite on topic. I am providing an example in an attempt to help you understand why your point about circular reasoning is incorrect. @Mathieus the Walking Witness

2019-09-17 15:03:32 UTC  

Which would be manipulating gravity

2019-09-17 15:03:44 UTC  

@Lucidity was muted

2019-09-17 15:03:54 UTC  

Say the Cavendish experiment is fake IDC tbh just trying to tell the person it is literally impossible to manipulate gravity

2019-09-17 15:04:11 UTC  

The structure of the moth experiment is the same as the structure of the cavendish experiment because they both use the scientific method, and both have independent and dependent variables.

2019-09-17 15:04:17 UTC  

Independent variable is on the x axis and the dependent variable is on the y axis

2019-09-17 15:04:21 UTC  

its impossible to manipulate electric force also

2019-09-17 15:04:22 UTC  

You can't measure gravity

2019-09-17 15:04:54 UTC  

physicists use the formula f = ma (force = mass x acceleration). Since the acceleration of gravity is 9.8m/s2 on Earth – ie little g – we can easily calculate the Newton force of any mass

2019-09-17 15:05:01 UTC  

This is literally no sense ^

2019-09-17 15:05:03 UTC  

change charge
change mass
and both are reliant on distance
they are mathematicaly identical to test
its just gravity is much weaker

2019-09-17 15:05:12 UTC  

It measures force

2019-09-17 15:05:14 UTC  

Actually, it makes a ton of sense

2019-09-17 15:05:17 UTC  

Not gravity

2019-09-17 15:05:36 UTC  

Gravity is not a force

2019-09-17 15:05:38 UTC  

gravity applies a force

2019-09-17 15:05:41 UTC  

Watch this woman replicate the cavendish experiment, and then mathematically confirm her results

2019-09-17 15:05:51 UTC  

only way to test it is to measure the force given some properties

2019-09-17 15:05:51 UTC  

It applies/uses force

2019-09-17 15:05:54 UTC  

But it is not force

2019-09-17 15:05:58 UTC  

If you push something

2019-09-17 15:06:00 UTC  

so does electromagnetism

2019-09-17 15:06:02 UTC  

That is not gravity

2019-09-17 15:06:14 UTC  

Gravity is a fundamental force of the universe.

2019-09-17 15:06:22 UTC  

electricity is not a force either
it applies forces

2019-09-17 15:06:25 UTC  

Who told you that?

2019-09-17 15:06:28 UTC  

Let me ask you something, do you believe that electromagnetism exists?