Message from @MEE6
Discord ID: 623534826820993034
@Mathieus the Walking Witness weight of the balls
How many balls being used
If you can't change the weight or the amount being used than the experiment is shiat
Okay, genius. A scientist is testing the effect of light and dark on the behavior of moths by turning a light on and off. The independent variable is the amount of light and the moth's reaction is the dependent variable. So the experiment proves that moths are attracted to light based on circular reasoning? of course not. @Mathieus the Walking Witness
overexposure of the camera
<#538929818834698260>
@Mathieus the Walking Witness idk, Idc about the experiment I'm just saying it should be the independent variable
Those with a keen eye might of noticed two white dots to the right of the triangle shaped like crescents in both my photos and nasas footage ,ALONG WITH A RED TRIANGLE
what are the two crescent dots too
Gravity cannot be the independent variable in any experiment
@ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan u still a crackhead concaver?
Unless you plan on doing the experiment on earth and space
No, I am quite on topic. I am providing an example in an attempt to help you understand why your point about circular reasoning is incorrect. @Mathieus the Walking Witness
Which would be manipulating gravity
@Lucidity was muted
Say the Cavendish experiment is fake IDC tbh just trying to tell the person it is literally impossible to manipulate gravity
The structure of the moth experiment is the same as the structure of the cavendish experiment because they both use the scientific method, and both have independent and dependent variables.
Independent variable is on the x axis and the dependent variable is on the y axis
its impossible to manipulate electric force also
You can't measure gravity
physicists use the formula f = ma (force = mass x acceleration). Since the acceleration of gravity is 9.8m/s2 on Earth – ie little g – we can easily calculate the Newton force of any mass
This is literally no sense ^
change charge
change mass
and both are reliant on distance
they are mathematicaly identical to test
its just gravity is much weaker
It measures force
Actually, it makes a ton of sense
Not gravity
Gravity is not a force
gravity applies a force
Watch this woman replicate the cavendish experiment, and then mathematically confirm her results
only way to test it is to measure the force given some properties
It applies/uses force
But it is not force
If you push something
so does electromagnetism
That is not gravity
Gravity is a fundamental force of the universe.
electricity is not a force either
it applies forces
Who told you that?
Let me ask you something, do you believe that electromagnetism exists?