Mhm

a nuclear weapon would be temporary, a nuclear reactor can cause damage lasting billions of years

Yes, but can't nuclear blast dropped on cities cause more deaths or no?

oh you mean those places that were actually bombed with incendiary bombs?
nukes? oh weren't they supposed to uninhabitable for millions of years?
seem to be doing pretty good today if you ask me

nuclear reactors dont stop once they go ciritcal and meltdown

@Seeker of Truth where is it?

yeah seeker

@Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids yes I know the thing Im asking

Hiroshima 1st picture
Nagasaki 2nd picture

sorry but you've been lied to and people have been control by fear

thousands of people died seeker

Idk they had radiation affects

sure people die in war

I don't think bombs do radiation effects

but not always by the reasons we are told

it wasnt a nuclear diasaster it was a blast that killed hundreds of thousands

if it was a disaster no one would be there most likley

https://youtu.be/b293Ok7FLV4

nuclear wasteland nowdays for sure... look at all the mutants running amock on the streets there today lol

give me a break

the soviet union murdered tens of millions of people and you have its flag on your pfp @The Sun

Problem?

yes

kk

definitly

❌ communism

https://youtu.be/Wmroc-RVhs0

Chernobyl seeker, I don't think it's habitable for most people, and I probably won't be for thousands

This is not by a bomb ^

Nuclear plant =/= Nuclear bomb

thats a nuclear fascility that elted down, not nuclear weapons

melted

I know

Chernobyl is 33 in gematria, another Freemasonic staged / hoaxed event

i know it melted down

im not\

re

tar