My question is, what exactly were you trying to say?

That the argument was weak?

i don't care what the earth is, i will never know what it is. it's just that most arguments can easily be debunked and there's no irrefutable evidence for any model

What about math?

I kind of see where you're coming from now

*bans @Logrian *

i've already seen both sides, a lot of globe earthers misrepresent was flat earth is

irrefutable, specifically

@Yabai what math proves globe earth?

Trigonometry. I don't know exactly how you set it up - better yet, I don't remember how I saw it done, but you can prove that the sun and other starts in the night are not local and in fact extremely far away by measuring how they move in the sky relative to your position on the ground.

for me, irrefutable evidence would be going to space and seeing it for yourself or just flying a balloon beyond the stratosphere which most of them pop. can you elaborate on the math?

just give me a link

to what you saw

I will try, but I'm going to have to look around for a bit to find it again. Give me a minute.

https://youtu.be/epwUTVUwB7A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeMooNFtFJk

@FatBeat

This is messed up!!! 😮

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-10-06-woman-at-aoc-townhall-demands-everyone-eat-the-babies.html

He focuses on disproving flat earth for about half of it, but also has the rest of the time dedicated to explaining why the globe earth works

🤢
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-10-06-you-cant-make-knife-out-of-frozen-human-feces.html

I've already acknowledged star trails which is what the video is about correct? They don't work on flat earth but that doesn't necessarily mean the earth is a globe.

lol who cares about online friends, care about the ones you see irl

oh damn

sorry bruv

He explains exactly why they work on the globe in that video @FatBeat

It is evidence for the globe but it doesn't mean that the earth is 100% for the globe, flat earth also has some evidence.

That's like stopping at water doesn't curve and saying the earth is flat, it's not infallible proof for what the shape is.

Well, I'm not addressing that as a be-all-end-all proof for a globe earth. I'm addressing what you said about it not necessarily being *some* evidence for a globe earth - which it is, and you admit that much.

Yeah, it's pretty good evidence which is why I addressed it with the coriolis effect when I addressed globe evidence.

Would you call it irrefutable evidence?

No

Why?

I wouldn't say the earth is flat because I've never seen water curve, however if I see the whole earth with my eyes I would consider that irrefutable evidence.

Nor would I say the earth is round because of star trails

So, you have clear evidence of one thing, but deny it because you only consider what you can see for yourself as irrefutable evidence?

There's clear evidence for both things, I don't deny both I refuse to accept one of the 2 as the decisive argument that decides which shape the earth is.

@Abe Lover who did you piss off?

Bruv I got muted and I just joined

Can you show clear evidence for the flat earth?

Water never curves and you can't ever see curvature unless some space agency shows you it.