Message from @Yabai
Discord ID: 630604612973494282
He focuses on disproving flat earth for about half of it, but also has the rest of the time dedicated to explaining why the globe earth works
I've already acknowledged star trails which is what the video is about correct? They don't work on flat earth but that doesn't necessarily mean the earth is a globe.
lol who cares about online friends, care about the ones you see irl
oh damn
sorry bruv
It is evidence for the globe but it doesn't mean that the earth is 100% for the globe, flat earth also has some evidence.
That's like stopping at water doesn't curve and saying the earth is flat, it's not infallible proof for what the shape is.
Well, I'm not addressing that as a be-all-end-all proof for a globe earth. I'm addressing what you said about it not necessarily being *some* evidence for a globe earth - which it is, and you admit that much.
Yeah, it's pretty good evidence which is why I addressed it with the coriolis effect when I addressed globe evidence.
Would you call it irrefutable evidence?
No
Why?
I wouldn't say the earth is flat because I've never seen water curve, however if I see the whole earth with my eyes I would consider that irrefutable evidence.
Nor would I say the earth is round because of star trails
So, you have clear evidence of one thing, but deny it because you only consider what you can see for yourself as irrefutable evidence?
There's clear evidence for both things, I don't deny both I refuse to accept one of the 2 as the decisive argument that decides which shape the earth is.
@Abe Lover who did you piss off?
Bruv I got muted and I just joined
Water never curves and you can't ever see curvature unless some space agency shows you it.
Know your role Spookette
I showed you curvature in images, so that is not true - regardless of why you think it is curved, whether it's an illusion or not. You can see curvature in some conditions.
Thats not curvature, sigh!
I responded with refraction. By your logic, that much of a curvature would also mean that you should see earths curvature from the view of an airplane.
here is a video showing water bend using electrostatic.
Sigh, thats not it at all.
I'm talking about water in the ocean, they're not effected by electrostatic charges.
I am not going through that argument again. The fact is, there is visible curvature. Period. If you think that's an optical illusion, that's fine, but it doesn't change the fact that you see it, which is why your statement is invalid.
@Abe Lover what server is this?
How do you ever expect to see water curve around the earth if not for an image from space?
@Yabai even Neil Degrasse Tyson says curvature is not visible. 🙄
Curvature is not visible under normal conditions. However, under some, it 100% is visible.
@Yabai Let's say your argument was real, that would mean you can see a lot of curvature correct? By that logic you should see it from an airplane but you don't. You're committing a false conclusion when you say the earth is too big to see curvature from 40 000 feet but that you can also observe it on earth bend that much.
Your friends don’t sound like friends at all Abe.
It doesn't matter what phenomenon you think explains it, but you can see a curve.
Not with inferred cameras you cannot though?
That is completely besides my point. Irrelevant. I'm not arguing science or observation here @FatBeat
You said that you never see curvature. That's simply not true.