Message from @jeremy
Discord ID: 635539947096506389
higher*
since its stronger the closer to the ground u are
Gym he told me earlier for earth based coriolis that the center of earth is the non inertial reference frame
i mean its written in the article u posted
he wanted 2 reference frames
Ok how do we get the number for refraction
one moving one not
What ๐ค
i set non moving to be earth core with x axis as rotational axis as earth
Just let me walk him through this nonsense too please lol
are you guys still on the same topic?
Where do u get the refraction number from
and other is 0,0,0 where u stand
No we r on Rowbotham
i did not put a refraction number just a height at which its less
and its from the article
Where do u get the number on how high to have the poles to account for refraction
hm
i got it somehwere let me look
I have to lead the globers of not inget taken down a road of nonsense
If not I get
ok didnt find it in the article it just emntions the refraction effect
gym u understand coriolis?
otherwise i can explain u like i did to jeremy first and u can then judge
the reference frames make all just more complicated anyway but he really wanted em
ahj i foudn it it was 4 meter not 3
errors of the preceding experiments and won the bet.[5][6] The crucial steps were to
Set a sight line 13 feet (4 m) above the water, and thereby reduce the effects of atmospheric refraction, and
Add a pole in the middle that could be used to see the "bump" caused by the curvature of the earth between the two end points.[1]
U explained nothing to me
U donโt understand coriolis lol
yes and i want to see if if someone else says the same afterwards
or if its just you not understanding
basically a test for myself to see if i talk nonsense
DM me memes
For meme review ๐๐๐
No I understand coriolis implicitly
i dont think so
cause u try to go with reference frames so strongly and then dont accept em
U think a reference frame is the center of earth you r the one who doesnโt understand the coriolis effect