Message from @MEE6

Discord ID: 635539863545970719


2019-10-20 18:06:37 UTC  

How u getting this refraction number

2019-10-20 18:06:44 UTC  

ther eis no number

2019-10-20 18:06:51 UTC  

what even is refraction

2019-10-20 18:06:53 UTC  

i said go heigher up to reduce influence of refraction

2019-10-20 18:07:00 UTC  

higher*

2019-10-20 18:07:03 UTC  

since its stronger the closer to the ground u are

2019-10-20 18:07:09 UTC  

Gym he told me earlier for earth based coriolis that the center of earth is the non inertial reference frame

2019-10-20 18:07:12 UTC  

i mean its written in the article u posted

2019-10-20 18:07:26 UTC  

he wanted 2 reference frames

2019-10-20 18:07:31 UTC  

Ok how do we get the number for refraction

2019-10-20 18:07:32 UTC  

one moving one not

2019-10-20 18:07:33 UTC  

What πŸ€”

2019-10-20 18:07:47 UTC  

i set non moving to be earth core with x axis as rotational axis as earth

2019-10-20 18:07:50 UTC  

Just let me walk him through this nonsense too please lol

2019-10-20 18:08:01 UTC  

are you guys still on the same topic?

2019-10-20 18:08:02 UTC  

Where do u get the refraction number from

2019-10-20 18:08:03 UTC  

and other is 0,0,0 where u stand

2019-10-20 18:08:10 UTC  

No we r on Rowbotham

2019-10-20 18:08:19 UTC  

i did not put a refraction number just a height at which its less

2019-10-20 18:08:28 UTC  

and its from the article

2019-10-20 18:08:42 UTC  

Where do u get the number on how high to have the poles to account for refraction

2019-10-20 18:08:43 UTC  

hm

2019-10-20 18:08:48 UTC  

i got it somehwere let me look

2019-10-20 18:08:51 UTC  

Ok

2019-10-20 18:09:13 UTC  

I have to lead the globers of not inget taken down a road of nonsense

2019-10-20 18:09:21 UTC  

If not I get

2019-10-20 18:11:37 UTC  

ok didnt find it in the article it just emntions the refraction effect

2019-10-20 18:11:58 UTC  

gym u understand coriolis?

2019-10-20 18:12:25 UTC  

otherwise i can explain u like i did to jeremy first and u can then judge

2019-10-20 18:12:44 UTC  

the reference frames make all just more complicated anyway but he really wanted em

2019-10-20 18:13:50 UTC  

ahj i foudn it it was 4 meter not 3

2019-10-20 18:13:51 UTC  

errors of the preceding experiments and won the bet.[5][6] The crucial steps were to

Set a sight line 13 feet (4 m) above the water, and thereby reduce the effects of atmospheric refraction, and
Add a pole in the middle that could be used to see the "bump" caused by the curvature of the earth between the two end points.[1]

2019-10-20 18:14:53 UTC  

U explained nothing to me

2019-10-20 18:14:59 UTC  

U don’t understand coriolis lol

2019-10-20 18:15:33 UTC  

yes and i want to see if if someone else says the same afterwards

2019-10-20 18:15:43 UTC  

or if its just you not understanding

2019-10-20 18:15:55 UTC  

basically a test for myself to see if i talk nonsense

2019-10-20 18:16:07 UTC  

DM me memes

2019-10-20 18:16:20 UTC  

For meme review πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘