@California Nightmare 3.0 hey bud im not a scientists i cant spend money to make an experiment

I have used a vacuum and things drop in it. However it proves not at all that is caused by mass to mass attraction.

With that being said why do we need space helmets for the moon?

kinda-ish i guess

Gravity explains stuff on both models

nah fam it's different from earth-s

@[IKON]Garnish so in other words
You can’t prove it

Okay

@California Nightmare 3.0 neither can you lol

i feel like you're testing me...

***i like it***

Your right
Because gravity isn’t proven

you're btw

nothing can

So how can I prove or disprove something that’s never been proven

Gravity is a literal circle conversation

Nothing gets done

Are you now admitting you can’t prove gravity?

we cant probe that gravity wont work in a situation we cant create, so it isnt 100% full proof

you can't prove anything unless you believe it

Were mass to mass attraction real. You are right in it would not disprove the Flat Earth. In fact the Flat Earth would have more mass under our feet possibly.

Just a bunch of no u

STEVE

Aww man

so we back in the mine

@California Nightmare 3.0 no im saying there could be a situation that gravity might not work but we cant create or havent found it. You cant prove that there is a 4 tailed squirel that can breed with a horse, so im right if i say there is. No, thats not how arguements work

No one said creeper

STEVE

aww man

I can prove things drop evenly in a Vacuum. What I can not prove is mass to mass attraction.

density doesnt keep you on the ground

@[IKON]Garnish so you still assert gravity when it’s not proven?

Sounds like a religion

Also gravity is not science
It is pseudoscience

@California Nightmare 3.0 no because your being super manipulative with my words

gravity is most definatley a science

Pseudoscience is a religion

SpOoKy