Message from @retiredDep

Discord ID: 472410543039315978


2018-07-27 14:28:02 UTC  

harems

2018-07-27 14:28:04 UTC  

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 requires an alien to apply for a petition for naturalization. This form may be obtained from any office of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, a division of the Department of Justice, or from any court authorized to naturalize aliens.

Before applying, an alien must be at least 18 years old and must have been lawfully admitted to live permanently in the United States. He must have lived in the United States for five years and for the last six months in the state where he seeks to be naturalized. In some cases, he need only have lived three years in the United States. He must be of good moral character and "attached to the principles of the Constitution". The law states that an alien is not of good moral character if he is a drunkard, has committed adultery, has more than one wife, makes his living by gambling, has lied to the Immigration and Naturalization Service, has been in jail more than 180 days for any reason during his five years in the United States, or is a convicted murderer.

2018-07-27 14:28:08 UTC  

@Deleted User Working........🤔

2018-07-27 14:28:15 UTC  

(always ish)

2018-07-27 14:28:31 UTC  

The following list provides examples of those who were excluded from the Act prior to the 1990 amendment. While it has not been substantiated that all of these individuals formally petitioned to become United States Citizens, many were banned from travelling to the US because of anti-American political views and/or criminal records. Among those listed, there are noted communists, socialists, and anti-American sympathizers.[12]

Kōbō Abe, Japanese writer
Tom Bottomore, British sociologist
Dennis Brutus, South African writer
Boris Christoff, Bulgarian opera singer
Julio Cortázar, Argentine novelist
Mahmoud Darwish, Palestinian poet
Michel Foucault, French philosopher
Dario Fo, Italian playwright and recipient of the 1997 Nobel Prize in Literature[13]
Carlos Fuentes, Mexican writer
Gabriel García Márquez, Colombian novelist and recipient of the 1982 Nobel Prize in Literature
Graham Greene, British writer
Doris Lessing, writer and recipient of the 2007 Nobel Prize in Literature (Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) / Great Britain)
Ernest Mandel, scholar and Trotskyist activist[citation needed]
Farley Mowat, Canadian writer[14][15]
Jan Myrdal, Swedish scholar
Pablo Neruda, Chilean poet and recipient of the 1971 Nobel Prize in Literature
Carl Paivio, Finnish labor activist and anarchist[16]

2018-07-27 14:28:32 UTC  

I'm salaried so...

2018-07-27 14:28:44 UTC  

and it's friday

2018-07-27 14:28:45 UTC  

so

2018-07-27 14:28:57 UTC  

and the boss is in TX

2018-07-27 14:28:59 UTC  

so

2018-07-27 14:29:05 UTC  

Parts of the Act remain in place today, but it has been amended many times and was modified substantially by the Immigration and Nationality Services Act of 1965.

When regulations issued under the authority of the Passport Act of 1926 were challenged in Haig v. Agee, Congress enacted § 707(b) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1979 (Pub.L. 95–426, 92 Stat. 993, enacted October 7, 1978), amending § 215 of the Immigration and Nationality Act making it unlawful to travel abroad without a passport. Until that legislation, under the Travel Control Act of 1918, the president had the authority to require passports for foreign travel only in time of war.

Some provisions that excluded certain classes of immigrants based on their political beliefs were revoked by the Immigration Act of 1990, however members of Communist Parties are still banned from becoming citizens of the United States.

After the September 11, 2001 attacks, President George W. Bush implemented the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System and other border and immigration controls.

In January 2017, President Donald Trump's Executive Order 13769 made reference to the "Immigration and Nationality Act".[17]

2018-07-27 14:29:10 UTC  

@Magnify ✝ Q 👉MAGA-KAG I don't know if this will do any help on what you were asking but this Article is a good read http://www.wbdaily.com/democrats/1989-stealth-muslim-brotherhood-war-against-u-s/

2018-07-27 14:29:14 UTC  

tgif

2018-07-27 14:29:31 UTC  

@retiredDep you there?

2018-07-27 14:29:55 UTC  

@Powder 💜 yep still hanging out

2018-07-27 14:30:07 UTC  

@retiredDep alert here you might need these!

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/472410362441105418/th.png

2018-07-27 14:30:14 UTC  

🍿

2018-07-27 14:30:19 UTC  

86 degrees...7:30. a.m.

2018-07-27 14:30:24 UTC  

@Powder 💜 love those cuffs

2018-07-27 14:30:29 UTC  

<:lolol:430293779472318475>

2018-07-27 14:30:50 UTC  

@Powder 💜 yep saw the subject

2018-07-27 14:30:58 UTC  

but seriously... an old friend of mine is the director of development at JibJab in L.A. ... I didn't realize this but they have a new app called GIFgab for mobile devices that make fun animated meme things... like this... if you feel so inclined please download and use-ify to create froggy fun: https://twitter.com/bracco/status/1014955984832217088

2018-07-27 14:30:59 UTC  

Nice color...

2018-07-27 14:31:03 UTC  

@retiredDep alert look 👈

2018-07-27 14:31:32 UTC  

@Powder 💜 I see him

2018-07-27 14:31:33 UTC  

Obama and HRC are going to be dancing today

2018-07-27 14:31:52 UTC  

'look at me' not at the success of Trump

2018-07-27 14:32:03 UTC  

Dear God

Thank you for another day
Please protect our country, and our leadership
Amen

2018-07-27 14:32:06 UTC  

You have gained a rank @eire, you just advanced to 3 . Thanks for all you do Patriot!

2018-07-27 14:32:12 UTC  
2018-07-27 14:32:14 UTC  

@retiredDep @silowetr he is 👂 ing

2018-07-27 14:32:37 UTC  

anyone have the link to the Brill fundraiser still? I'd like to not forget about promoting that on YT

2018-07-27 14:32:39 UTC  

_is baaaaaaaaaaaaaaack_

2018-07-27 14:32:42 UTC  

baby!

2018-07-27 14:32:46 UTC  

hello powder - havent seen u for ages - how do???

2018-07-27 14:32:51 UTC  

welcome back!

2018-07-27 14:33:01 UTC  

Constitutional prohibitions and accommodations Edit
Because of the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution, no religious tradition can be established as the basis of laws that apply to everyone, including any form of sharia, Christian canon law, Jewish halakha, or rules of dharma from Eastern religions. Laws must be passed in a secular fashion, not by religious authorities. The Free Exercise Clause allows residents to practice any religion or no religion, and there is often controversy about separation of church and state and the balance between these two clauses when the government does or does not accommodate any particular religious practice (for example blue laws that require stores to be closed on Sunday, the Christian holy day).

Direct consultation of any religious law, including any form of sharia, is relatively rare in U.S. jurisprudence, and is generally limited to circumstances where the government is accommodating the religious belief of a specific person. This occurs mainly in matters of arbitration and family law. For example, the law may allow parties to submit a dispute for binding arbitration to a mutually agreed-upon religious authority; mandatory arbitration by a specified or mutually-agreed arbitrator is also a common clause in commercial and labor union contracts. Couples with the same religious beliefs may wish to construct marriage contracts and conduct divorces in concordance with those beliefs, and people may also wish to arrange wills and other financial matters in accordance with their own religious principles. If presented as evidence, devotion to peaceful religious principles, along with many other aspects of personality, is commonly considered when judging the character of a person before the law, for example during sentencing or a parole hearing.

2018-07-27 14:33:12 UTC  
2018-07-27 14:33:20 UTC  

Despite the Free Exercise Clause, the 1878 Supreme Court decision in Reynolds v. United States (which concerned the conflict of the Mormon practice of polygamy with anti-bigamy laws) affirmed that secular laws still apply when they contradict religious practices, unless a superseding law establishes a right to a religious accommodation. This means that belief in sharia cannot be used by itself as a justification for vigilante stonings or to prevent women from filing for divorce.