Message from @Légionnaire Étranger
Discord ID: 758064150508208198
@Yussuki ₪ you have contradicted once again
Yes @Légionnaire Étranger : The United Kingdom.
Are you now prepeared to admit you was wrong?
@Yussuki ₪ that's a constitutional monarchy
UK is also a Democracy.
A Parliamentary Democracy like Israel during the 6 day War 😉
There have been 1763 recorded wars in history. You are not able to produce 1 single war between 2 democracies.
@Yussuki ₪ ok so what distinguishes a democracy like the UK and non-democeacy like Saudi Arabia? They're both monarchies. The question is: what makes one a democracy and the other one not?
Very good question. The Answer is: rule of law / Separation of powers / Elected representatives / Antidiscrimination Mechanisms / Lack of Coruption - minimum requirements
@Yussuki ₪ I think I caught you in your little dishonest game. Not a good look
There have been 1763 recorded wars in history. You are not able to produce 1 single war between 2 democracies.
@Yussuki ₪ so not the right to vote?
@Yussuki ₪ hahahahahaha
😄
Right to vote is not the only criteria. Communists vote more than democrats actually.
Bro....do you like being humiliated online?
Why do you do this?
Shaming me worsen your situation. There have been 1763 recorded wars in history. You are not able to produce 1 single war between 2 democracies.
This is the 9th time you try to shame me. You are gealous cause I debunked your false arguments 😄
There have been 1763 recorded wars in history. You are not able to produce 1 single war between 2 democracies.
Ok ok ok. We get it man, you have that copy pasted. I gave you an example and you haven't done a very good job of explaining why it's not
@Yussuki ₪ Ecuador war vs Peru.
Ecuador 1995 and Peru 1995 were not 2 Democracies. They failed the minimal democratic criteria: Rule of Law, Power Separation, etc..above
You have yet to explain to me why Ecuador or Peumru weren't a democracies if they had separation of powers, elected representatives, etc
This is a better discussion to further the discussion.
Because Separation of Power / Rule of Law / VOTE / Antidiscrimination / Equality in law are the minimal requirements
Zino - who says these are the minimum requirements? Just asking
I could add more. Or take out one.
Not me. Transparency International / and the inventors of Democracy
HUMAN RIGHTS !!!
Ok - I’d like to see a document from transparency international that defines these as the minimum requirements for democracy?
Or ‘inventors of democracy’ whoever they are.
Peru's President pardoned convicted criminal abuse criminals. war criminals..
@Yussuki ₪ so whatever country violates human rights , they are not democracies?
I’m genuinely asking. And I’ll tell you why. Any theoretical ideas of governemnet or otherwise, they all seem to be open to redefine to prove any point.
@Yussuki ₪ stop making stuff up and actually give me something you believe in
I want us to be clear so the discussion can move forward.
@Légionnaire Étranger . You know what's funny? Even if you would be right (absurd as it seems) from 1700+ wars since the beginning of time..you can produce only 1 war between 2 democracies. (Ofc its not true, but lets just say you right, wouldnt you find it true that: "Democracies dont wage war against each other?") --- this was the initial discussion
Ok - so I quickly skimmed through it. Even by the articles own admission - it is easier to define what is not democratic than what is democracy.
Secondly