Message from @Malachi

Discord ID: 758768026769948694


2020-09-24 18:12:23 UTC  

It is not a crime to have the flu or to have COVID

2020-09-24 18:12:37 UTC  

And if it is, then we’re all potential criminals, including the ones enforcing the law

2020-09-24 18:12:56 UTC  

Your tyrannical system inevitably ends in war. Start stocking up now

2020-09-24 18:18:04 UTC  

You did make the rape analogy.

2020-09-24 18:18:09 UTC  

What Malachi and I were trying to point out was that laws exist that limit liberties - for good reasons of course. More specifically preventative laws exist that limit liberties. In that way a nudity law and a mask law are the same.

2020-09-24 18:18:26 UTC  

Because I’m an intellectually honest person, or try to be

2020-09-24 18:18:34 UTC  

A better line of argument for you JP would be

2020-09-24 18:19:14 UTC  

That the distinction is not preventative or otherwise. The distinction is limiting freedoms vs FORCING actions ( wearing masks, compelled speech etc)

2020-09-24 18:20:08 UTC  

But then you would have to admit that limiting crowds of 10 is ok while forcing mask wearing is not

2020-09-24 18:20:27 UTC  

Malachi - this was just a counter thought in my mind. Your thoughts @Malachi ?

2020-09-24 18:23:42 UTC  

I think that the distinction here is public spaces. But to be honest our lives are limited in private as well.
To be frank, JP is under some insane 'maximal freedom all the time' type of philosophy that doesn't play out in the real world.

2020-09-24 18:24:56 UTC  

To me he is playing the game of "I'm not touching you, I'm not touching you" and he thinks he won't get slugged in the gut anyway. at that point it doesn't matter who is right, it matters what we allow in our society.

2020-09-24 18:33:20 UTC  

Ok. But I’m just wondering if what I said would be a reasonable objection

2020-09-24 18:58:47 UTC  

Nothing about “rape” was an analogy. Rape was the reason I gave for why the analogy was a terrible one.

If you impose one rule to prevent a crime, don’t compare that to imposing a rule that doesn’t.

If carrying viruses is a crime, we can impose all sorts of tyranny on others.

2020-09-24 18:59:25 UTC  

Malachi, I love how “public” means “private” to you.

2020-09-24 18:59:54 UTC  

Public means public. Is there a space I can be free that’s not inside my own home?

2020-09-24 19:07:21 UTC  

Do you agree that there are two spaces, public and private?

2020-09-24 19:07:56 UTC  

Also, I just completed my school work for the week! Woot!

2020-09-24 19:12:33 UTC  

There are public spaces. We can’t commit crimes there, but we are free. All crimes boil down to infringing on someone else’s life or liberty.

You’re literally insane if you think carrying a virus is a crime. Or leads to crime.

And that it somehow justifies using force against non criminal, free, people in a public space.

Tyrant.

2020-09-24 19:12:49 UTC  

Do you agree that all tyrants felt justified in their reasons for tyranny?

2020-09-24 19:13:14 UTC  

Did you know that the word Tyrant only recently became negative.

2020-09-24 19:13:58 UTC  

Also my answer would be yes. People tend to justify their actions.

2020-09-24 19:14:24 UTC  

did you aska question that I missed?

2020-09-24 21:05:29 UTC  

This blew my mind:

2020-09-24 22:43:22 UTC  

Does anybody really believe slip between 0 and 19 years of age there has been only 4 people that have died from covid-19 N20 with pre-existing conditions

2020-09-24 22:59:56 UTC  

> This blew my mind:
@dogbref
It's definitely much more likely to kill those with pre existing illness.

2020-09-24 23:00:58 UTC  

But for some reason people don't like the "fuck your grandpa, I want to go to the beach."

2020-09-24 23:01:42 UTC  

It would be more likely to kill me. I haven't done anything fun for a long time.

2020-09-24 23:03:14 UTC  

I also would like to point out that I am not a virologist. I am also not under the impression that my government wants me afraid of stuff. I'm not under the impression that there is a control feature here.

2020-09-24 23:05:13 UTC  

Virusologists also have split opinions.

2020-09-24 23:07:21 UTC  

It's a weird phenomenon in today's society. I don't argue with my Dentist about flossing. I don't argue with my mechanic about my brake pads. I don't argue with my pot dealer about growing weed (they are better). I don't argue (much) with tax preparers.

For some reason, everyone wants to argue about diseases.

2020-09-24 23:10:33 UTC  

I would like to be like you than.

2020-09-25 17:10:53 UTC  

Hey hey hey

2020-09-25 19:00:06 UTC  

Yo yo yo

2020-09-25 19:33:50 UTC  

If you're not skeptical of COVID you're not a skeptic! You have faith in authority. Government is your god.

2020-09-25 20:17:01 UTC  

Ok but what if I know people who have had covid?

2020-09-25 20:53:54 UTC  

People believe in the existence of Covid, but they dispute its severity.

2020-09-25 23:06:57 UTC  

> If you're not skeptical of COVID you're not a skeptic! You have faith in authority. Government is your god.
@Baal Diablo

It's not faith in authority. It's literally having no other options. I'll listen to the people that WE pay to do science, when it comes to matters of science.

2020-09-26 01:58:00 UTC  

Too bad the people we think we pay don't feel the same way.

2020-09-26 12:51:00 UTC  

There no such thing as virus ... until today 2020 they still dont know how work , so why anyone would trust them .....