Message from @Zurich04
Discord ID: 755130986630610975
See you later guys I need to go 🙂
Wont interrupt ur conversation
> Oh Michaela. Lol
@kevinkaos bahahahaha I get that reaction a lot in my life.
@Yussuki ₪ thanks for educating us on your culture
I second that, it was tremendously insightful @Yussuki ₪
@everyone https://youtu.be/MzW9hc8LuKM
Shapiros take on it was pretty good I thought
Like you have to respect the intent of the director of showing how disgusting our culture is, but there’s a serious question to be asked if it’s okay to sexualize children in service did saying why sexualizing children is bad
@kcon415 re your previous message
Madonna was threatened with arrest if she performed such moves on tour 30 years ago. Its an iconic pose.
https://todayinmadonnahistory.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/blond-ambition-wembley-3.jpg
Your*
i don't understand this scene without context
@everyone defamation on Twitter???? No wayyy!.... I have zero tolerance. https://twitter.com/ThePangburn/status/1305565642536353797?s=20
Sounds fun.
Though I am curious about to what extent you could potentially pursue such a thing
see? lmao
There are avenues to persue.
Defamation seems like a helluva legal road
It can be a tough one. But I see it as a worthwhile pursuit.
is there any discussion today?
Yep
Firing it up soon
If you want to see the level of irrationality in this #savethechildren movement, read these comments https://twitter.com/ThePangburn/status/1305556587960889344?s=20
@ThePangburn you understand that within a rounding error, no one employs skepticism in the slightest on the big moral questions. And even within this chat room, people here who think about this stuff all day every day are employing skepticism and STILL see some of what you say on this issue as problematic. you had to have known this would be the reaction
Outside a rounding error I should say
> @ThePangburn you understand that within a rounding error, no one employs skepticism in the slightest on the big moral questions. And even within this chat room, people here who think about this stuff all day every day are employing skepticism and STILL see some of what you say on this issue as problematic. you had to have known this would be the reaction
@BobbyMack "no one employs skepticism" you need Steven Pinker in your life. Skepticism is on a rampant rise, statistically. Just because someone thinks all day does not mean that they are thinking correctly. Seeing problems with what I say is different than saying "he's a pedophile". You're missing it all together. I just posted about the irrationality in the comments. You should've asked, what kind of comments are the irrational ones? Critiques of my position are not automatically irrational. Taking the logical leap to call me a pedophile is.
But what I'm saying is that when you speak that way to the general public, of course that's what they're going to jump to. It took a very long time yesterday on voice for people to find common ground with you on this. I don't really think it's something that can be explained in a few hundred characters. If people don't know anything else about you, that's going to be the reaction you get
And that's the issue.
The automaticity of the response.
The general public has spectacularly stupid knee jerk reactions to things like this. What they commented is exactly to be expected when posting something like that
Exactly what I'm saying^
Even though it’s incredibly irrational, society is a hive mind of these type of reactions
I didn't say the twitter reactions were the right response, but it will be the response. and with zero other context about who you are, it sounds worse than if you knew you were a philosopher
they knew*
@everyone the open mic will be GOD today
philosopher XD
Based off of my experience, I’d say the general public doesn’t even know the actual implications of being a philosopher so I don’t think it’d make a difference
Oh good lord. I'll get the mute button ready lmao