Message from @DeplorablePapa
Discord ID: 468568196312596500
he's entertaining sometimes
Not a fan of Hannity
Whiter than u mohammed
Who’s more or less the same tier
in a way, though Hannity is more of a yes man
imo
Of not quite neocon but not quite normie/paleocon
i don't know there is a pretty strong argument that he is Tea Party NeoCon tier
hannity i mean
Stand WIth Israel, Lower Texas
Whiter than u mohammed
that's all we care about
Yeah but he’s an hawk on immigration
yeah
this is a good thing
So not suite neocon like I said
And fully supports killing the deep state
Whiter than u mohammed
is being anti-border a rule for all neo-con "intellectuals" though
?
I dunno Buchanan, Hitchens and other Con writers
Define it as part of it
Buchanan is Paelo Con
I know
oh right
gocha
i didn't wait to see your second line
Just hoe they define it
I take Buchanan, Hitchens and Scruton etc pretty seriously on stuff like that
so where would you put someone like Romney at least the positions he took when he ran the first time. Strongly anti immigraiton, but pro Israel and pro war
know what i mean?
clearly a neo con
I don’t know there’s has to be s name for a neocon whobdoesnt for all the boxes
Ann Coulter endorsed him the first time because of his immigration stance
she is clearly in our camp
but he isn't
Romney has shown his true globohomo colors since Trump became a thing
So here someone on the right who liked degeneracy and immigration can be called a Low Tory and if in addition to that they like war to you can call them a neocon -Liam fox is a neocon, but Ana Soubry is just a lie Tory
right, i'm not talking specifically about him, I'm talking about a generic politician who is pro Israel/pro War but against open borders
Does the us have any such distinction