Message from @Hot Singles in Your Area
Discord ID: 455931131737669633
Okay, replace *dick* with *XYZ bad thing*.
cut our tumors off
idk sounds pretty nice to me
@Deleted User Poor point tbh
That made no sense
<:smug1:424005084398223363>
Migrant solidarity with European heritage is one thing
We don't need to import the brown third world
Nazis (natsocs) and fascists actually push me further from authoritarianism tbh
@Hot Singles in Your Area
No, it's a good point; the nation was built of off Europeans who became European-Americans and immigrants replace that group.
The other point is showing that doing something because the founders intended it is stupid because someone saying *do X because XYZ said so and we're meant to* is an appeal to authority and it's nonsensical because we could come up with stupid shit they wanted to do that you don't agree with. For instance, the founders signed in the 1790 naturalization act for whites only being naturalized: do you agree with that?
Just as communism pushed me away from leftism, nazism is gonna push me away from authoritarianism
Who said I'm a fascist or a NatSoc?
I never said you were
I wont name names but still
That's a pretty fucking offhand comment. It's like me saying *a pedophiles push me away from authorizations*.
I know, just saying lol
🤔
Anyhow, the far majority of America has been European-Americans. You love America but insist on replacing European-Americans. What gives, big guy?
1. I meant your second point, I wasn't talking about your first one
2.Who said i wanted to do what the founders intended? 🤔
I dont recall even mentioning the founders
Its late at night
So maybe i said something like that?
1. How is saying that European-Americans built the country and are being replaced a stupid point?
2. I was using the founders as an example. You can replace *founders* with *country* and still get the same argument.
im tired of the third world being here
1. I never said *that* was stupid, but now this is starting to get.... whats the word.... petty? Dunno, replace that word with a better one. But what was this argument about anyways?
I better get to bed soon, so lets wrap this up as soon as possible, please
1. Pretty sure you called it stupid. But whatever, my apologies if you did not.
Basically the argument was that if European-Americans should have their own soviegn homeland or not. You say no, I say yes.
What do you mean by sovereign homeland though?
As in a territory to which they own and make up the super majority of demographics in.
Does that matter
Yes.
White people still make up most of the US population
I mean its best to have some outside input so i guess limited immigration is important
Do they make up a super majority and/or is the country set for their ownership, @Deleted User? What percentage of the U.S. do they make up?
77%
@Hot Singles in Your Area, a European-American state doesn't mean you can't have a limted immigration system. It just means that EuroAmericans stay the super majority.
^
76.9% rounded up is 77%
@Deleted User Then i agree, to a certain degree at least