Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 474298297301991475
I'd say private for a general answer but really depends on the resource and situation in question
Private ownership of land and resources but only for individuals and companies native to the country. Free trade benefits us all, but we shouldn’t allow other nations to rob us of the fruits of our own lands. Take Romania for example. Germany is fucking the shit out of them. Germany has strict rules when it comes to cutting timber in Germany , so they just go to Romania, buy the land from poor farmers, and clear the forest out. It’s bull shit.
And Romania can’t do anything because the EU forces them to let Germany in.
abolish the EU
and the UN
STATE
Private Ownership is good in fields where quality outweighs necessity
Privately owned things will be managed in such a way that are most beneficial for the company. So services and some products. But the nation should directly control its resources, as they pertain directly to the nation. They are a necessity of the state if not the populace itself.
The whole point of The United States of America is to make the title President of The United States of America not the most powerful one in the world.
Reduce federalism
Agreed
If people gain power of the current USA who really shouldn't, we're in trouble. Bring back statism
Im a regionalist
It's called regionalism? I thought it was just statism
I believe in organized cooperative secession between the cultural regions of the USA. I.e., I want all nations to work together to achieve their own sovreignty
@Deleted User depends on the quality of the individuals in said country
I think that political systems overall are very subjective
it depends on the populace
for instance I think most whites have lost their sense of purpose and way in life, in the USA, Europe, etc.
So while I oppose statism as I believe it to be not optimal, it might be beneficial for the state to own the resources and use them to give people a national purpose and thus unity
The USA right now has no reason to exist. The whites in the USA thus have no reason to exist beyond personal ones, which most people don't have. They're sleepwalking through life while brown people slowly replace them.
^
Well said
I'm not an ethnic nationalist, but I do see the (almost) inevitability of the death of the white race as a severe problem
And that we should work to rectify this
in group preference by whites and exclusion of non-whites in nearly every professional capacity
hispanics/blacks already have this via government violence (affirmative action), asians do this in their small businesses
Obviously I think I and others are in principle against this but the fact is literally every group except whites does this, and jews do it to great success
Like instead of hiring some illegal spic to do your roof, spend a bit of extra money for a white
It should be in the hands of the state to be used by its countrymen instead of being used by greed businesses.
Well you fail to understand that most states are NWO tier
@everyone 🔖 Daily Question
Which is more important? Economic growth or maintaining tradition? Are they mutually exclusive? Explain
maintaining tradition
economic growth
Economic growth.
tradition is meaningless
^
Without followers
Economic growth.
i don't think those are mutually exclusive things tho