@everyone 🔖 Daily Question

Do you believe that it is better for private companies to be in possession of your country's natural resources, or should they be in the hands of the state? Explain your reasoning.

that's a question with a lot of hypotheticals.

Hi

The State, they have to atleast pretend like they care about the integrity of the Nation and not destroy everything for shekels.

They should be in the hands of whomever gets them /shrug

INDIVIDUAL

commie

COLLECTIVE

commie

I am a libertarian

he means libertarian (socialist)

Private ownership is best for resources

wew imagine someone unironically saying that

I am a libertarian

I'd say private for a general answer but really depends on the resource and situation in question

Private ownership of land and resources but only for individuals and companies native to the country. Free trade benefits us all, but we shouldn’t allow other nations to rob us of the fruits of our own lands. Take Romania for example. Germany is fucking the shit out of them. Germany has strict rules when it comes to cutting timber in Germany , so they just go to Romania, buy the land from poor farmers, and clear the forest out. It’s bull shit.

And Romania can’t do anything because the EU forces them to let Germany in.

abolish the EU

and the UN

STATE

Private Ownership is good in fields where quality outweighs necessity

Privately owned things will be managed in such a way that are most beneficial for the company. So services and some products. But the nation should directly control its resources, as they pertain directly to the nation. They are a necessity of the state if not the populace itself.

The whole point of The United States of America is to make the title President of The United States of America not the most powerful one in the world.

Reduce federalism

Agreed

If people gain power of the current USA who really shouldn't, we're in trouble. Bring back statism

Im a regionalist

It's called regionalism? I thought it was just statism

I believe in organized cooperative secession between the cultural regions of the USA. I.e., I want all nations to work together to achieve their own sovreignty

@Deleted User depends on the quality of the individuals in said country

I think that political systems overall are very subjective

it depends on the populace

for instance I think most whites have lost their sense of purpose and way in life, in the USA, Europe, etc.

So while I oppose statism as I believe it to be not optimal, it might be beneficial for the state to own the resources and use them to give people a national purpose and thus unity

The USA right now has no reason to exist. The whites in the USA thus have no reason to exist beyond personal ones, which most people don't have. They're sleepwalking through life while brown people slowly replace them.

^

Well said

I'm not an ethnic nationalist, but I do see the (almost) inevitability of the death of the white race as a severe problem

And that we should work to rectify this

in group preference by whites and exclusion of non-whites in nearly every professional capacity