Message from @Summī Imperator, 呪い殿
Discord ID: 487393480335949824
There is no objective morality.
There are no facts of it.
Nothing that proves it is.
There is only your opinion.
I have given standards to validate it
You dodged all my questions on the subjects of what is more right, and how it righteousness is dictated.
When did I dodge them? What were they?
What are natural rights?
And "evolutionary psychology" is just genetic memory.
So genetics are partly to determine what is moral?
To what extent?
And if that is so, not all humans are genetically identical, with so much variation, how is that a proper determinant?
Natural rights is the philosophical concept of the state of nature for an individual to be truly free from outside compulsion and force.
Then it's an opinion.
A concept.
Genral relgion based on race, muslims have no parted morals, there is not straight guideline 'rules' to morals
religion*
general*
Natural rights are a concept. That isn't the basis for morality though, it is a standard to check it too.
Then what *is* the objective morality?
How does it exist?
I'm not debating what it is, just that it is objective
You have to define things to debate
None of which you have done.
You haven't told me how it exists, why it exists, when it came to exist, where it exists, what it exists as.
Only said it does
Which is faith.
Which apparently is an opinion m
Wtf? Most of those questions don't apply to morality at all
And opinions are not facts.
The relate to the existence of this "objective" morality.
Whatever that is.
And that is what we are talking about, not morality itself.
But the existence of an objective reality.
That was the question
What? Are you treating morality as an object?
Is morality objective, or subjective?
You said objective, so that means it exists.
Which means there is a way to validate the facts surrounding it.
A concept can not be objective.